Skip to main content

iRubric: CAD Drawing rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CAD Drawing 
CAD Drawing
Rubric Code: ZBC8WA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric CAD Drawing
  Poor

1 pts

Average

2 pts

Excellent

3 pts

Notes

(N/A)

Line weights and Type

Poor

Line weights and Type were not applied and used in any manner.
Average

Line Weights and Types were applied and used, but not in the correct manner.
Excellent

Line Weights and Types were applied and used correctly throughout the entire drawing.
Notes
Dimensions Lines

Poor

Drawing has no dimensions of product.
Did not use or missed more than 3 dimensions. Dimension were not accurate. Extension lines were hard to follow missing or not uniform. Text was not uniform and format was not to the correct decimal point.
Average

Drawing has some dimensions of product.
Missed one or two needed dimensions.
Dimensions were there but not clear and accurate.
Extension lines were hard to follow, possibly misplaced.
Text was not uniform and format was not to the correct decimal point.
Excellent

Drawing has all dimensions of product.
All dimensions were accurately marked.
Dimensions were correct and easily identified.
Extension lines were even and clearly marked beginning and end of intended piece.
Dimensions were in correct format and uniform text.
Notes
Neatness and Accuracy

Poor

Text is of various sizes and some is hard to read and identify.
Product was not easily deciphered and not easily recognized.
Student paid no attention to detail.
Workmanship and quality was of low standard.
Need of improvements were clear and recognizable.
Average

Text is of various sizes but can be read and identified.
Product was not easily deciphered and not easily recognized.
Student did not pay attention to detail.
Workmanship and quality was of moderate standard.
Need of improvements were clear and recognizable.
Excellent

Text is uniform and easily identifiable.
Product was easily deciphered and recognized.
Student paid attention to detail.
Workmanship and quality was of a high standard.
Notes
Views

Poor

Front, side and top views were not used.
Some information was missing.
Notes were not used, information was not complete to explain portions of the drawing.
Average

Front, side and top views were used and recognizable.
Some information was included and identifiable.
Notes were used but information was not complete to explain portions of the drawing.
Excellent

Front, side and top views were used and recognizable.
All information was included and easily identified.
Notes were used if further information was needed to explain portions of the drawing.
Notes
On Time

Poor

This person did not turn assignment in on time. Was at least 2 weeks late.
Average

This person turned in assignment late, but within two weeks and was actively working on it to ensure a higher quality product.
Excellent

This person turned the assignment in on time and with attention to detail and quality craftsmanship.
Notes










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n7