Skip to main content

iRubric: Interview Comparisons rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Interview Comparisons 
Observation Project Rubric
Conduct two interviews and compare the data
Rubric Code: ZBB8X2
By proflevym
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Interview Comparison
  Poor

1 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Topic, goal, selection

Poor

Student failed to discuss their topic, goal and how they selected respondents and their sampling technique.
Acceptable

Student discussed most of their topic, goal and how they selected respondents and their sampling technique.
Excellent

Student discussed all their topic, goal and how they selected respondents and their sampling technique.
Methodology/ problems

Poor

Student failed to discuss the time, place, length of interview, how they recorded information, and how they felt during interviews.
Acceptable

Student adequately discussed the time, place, length of interview, how they recorded information, and how they felt during interviews.
Excellent

Student discussed all the details including the time, place, length of interview, how they recorded information, and how they felt during interviews.
Techniques/Rapport

Poor

Student failed to discuss what techniques they used or how they established rapport during their interviews.
Acceptable

Student adequately discussed what techniques they used and/or or how they established rapport during their interviews.
Excellent

Student discussed their techniques in great depth and/or how they established rapport during their interviews.
Findings

Poor

Student failed to adequately discuss their findings, theories and comments.
Acceptable

Student adequately discussed their findings, theories and comments.
Excellent

Student discussed their findings, theories and comments to great depth.
Conclusions

Poor

Student failed to discuss the data in depth, its meaning or what they would tell an audience or their conclusions.
Acceptable

Student adequately discussed the data in depth, its meaning or what they would tell an audience and some conclusions.
Excellent

Student discussed the data in depth and its meaning and what they would tell an audience about the topic and their conclusions.
Research Analysis/Opinion

Poor

Student failed to discuss what improvements they would make to their research or their overall opinion about this research assignment.
Acceptable

Student discussed some improvements they would make to their research or some opinion about this research assignment.
Excellent

Student properly discussed what improvements they would make to their research and their overall opinion about this research assignment.
Writing Quality

Poor

Poor writing, grammar, spelling, organization of paper
Acceptable

Satisfactory writing but some grammar, spelling errors and/or organization of paper needed improvement.
Excellent

Overall writing, grammar, spelling, organization of paper was excellent with very few spelling errors.
Field Notes

Poor

Missing/Too short
Acceptable

Good
Excellent

Excellent
Verbal presentation

Poor

not completed
Acceptable
Excellent

Completed





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178