Skip to main content
iRubric: Poster rubric

iRubric: Poster rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Poster 
This rubric is designed to evaluate the poster prepared by my undergraduate science writing students.
Rubric Code: Z9BX26
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Criteria and qualities
  Poor/Fair

0.3 pts

Good

0.85 pts

Excellent

1 pts

Introducing the issue:
Issue identification
5 pts

Poor/Fair

Neither implicit nor explicit reference is made to the issue that is to be examined.
Good

Readers are given the overall issuethat is to be examined.
Excellent

The issue is introduced, and readers are shown why this issue is significant and relevant to them.
Body:
Design and Layout
5 pts

Poor/Fair

The poster appears to have no clear organization or layout.
Good

There is a basic design scheme with consistent headings, subheadings, and alignment.
Excellent

The design scheme is both consistent and attractive, with users needs and interests taken into considerations.
Visual Elements
5 pts

Poor/Fair

The visual elements are absent or poorly done.
Good

The visual elements are attractive, but may not be used for any specific purpose.
Excellent

The visual elements are both attractive and functional. They address readers' interests and concerns, rather than simply attracting attention.
Style
5 pts

Clarity of writing

Poor/Fair

It is hard to know what the writer is trying to express. Writing is convoluted. Misspelled words, incorrect grammar, and improper punctuation are evident.
Good

Writing is generally clear, but active verbs are sometimes missing. Paragraphs may be too dense, visually, or they may employ excessive nominalizations and other scientific jargon not appropriate for the audience.
Excellent

Writing is crisp, clear, and succinct. The writer uses strong active verbs, clear sentence structure, and lists, checklists, and other kinds of text where appropriate. The level of technicality is appropriate for a public audience.
Additional information:
Take home
5 pts

Poor/Fair

There is no indication the author tried to summarize the information into a format audience members can take home.
Good

The author provides a take home document (such as a brochure, bookmark, fridge magnet, etc.), but it is poorly designed or written.
Excellent

The author created a clear, succinct, and useful take-home document to help readers take action or remember key information.
References
5 pts

Poor/Fair

Readers have no sources for additional information. Citations for statements included in the poster were not available.
Good

Readers may have trouble finding additional information.
Citations within the body of the poster and a corresponding reference list were presented, but some formatting problems exist, or components were missing.
Excellent

All needed citations were included in the poster. References matched the citations, and all were encoded in CSE format. Readers know where to go for additional information.



Keywords:
  • science writing, writing, poster, presentation


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232