Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Theological theme presentation from Col or Eph rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Theological theme presentation from Col or Eph
Media/Technology Presentation
Team presentation of theological theme in Col or Eph. The research must be solid, using scholarly sources. The presentation may take on a variety of forms, including interview styles, game shows, video clips taped ahead of time, a presentation with PowerPoint slides, Prezis, etc. Teams will have about 20 minutes. The presentation may not be read from a paper or from screens. Each presentation must have a prepared student resource.
Rubric Code:
Z99X8A
By
RenateHood
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Theological presentation Col or Eph
Exceeds
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Unacceptable
1 pts
Quality of project
25 %
Exceeds
Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow.
Project fully connected the theological theme to Col or Eph; it showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Good
Project was extremely organized. Information presented was clear and interesting. Project fully connected the theological theme to Col or Eph; it showed critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Fair
Project was fairly organized. Information presented somewhat clear. Project did not fully connect the theme to Col or Eph; it showed some critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Poor
Project was poorly organized. Information presented was clear at times. Project poorly connected the theme to Col or Eph; it showed poor thinking and little application of knowledge gathered.
Unacceptable
Project was not organized. Information presented was not clear. Project did not connect the theme to Col or Eph; it showed no critical thinking or application of knowledge gathered.
Classroom Presentation
25 %
Exceeds
Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the professor.
Good
Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.
Fair
Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were mostly
unable to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.
Poor
Presentation was somehwat audible, but needs lots of improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project need improvement. Group members were not able to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.
Unacceptable
Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the professor.
Preparedness
20 %
Exceeds
Students showed that they were completely prepared and that they had rehearsed before the presentation. They demonstrated knowledge of the subject area.
Good
Students seemed to be prepared but one person seemed to carry the success of the presentation.
Fair
Students seemed to be somewhat prepared but should have rehearsed more as a team.
Poor
Unacceptable
Students did not seem prepared to present.
Theme correlation to letter
15 %
Exceeds
The theme was correlated to the letter in a thorough manner.
Good
The theme was correlated toletter in multiple ways.
Fair
The theme was correlated to letter in a limited way.
Poor
The theme was correlated poorly to letter.
Unacceptable
The theme was in no way correlated to letter
Student handout
15 %
Exceeds
Group prepared a clear and informative student handout. The handout was submitted on the due date.
Good
Group prepared a fairly clear and informative student handout. The handout was submitted on the due date.
Fair
The group turned in a student handout on time but the handout lacked in content and organization.
Poor
The group had a student handout but turned it in late.
Unacceptable
The group did not have a student handout.
Keywords:
Theology presentation
Subjects:
English
Geology
Humanities
Social Sciences
Education
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.