iRubric: Case study analysis rubric

Analysis of literature review together with case study findings lacks depth and/or connection. Student makes few connections or inappropriate connections among findings, course concepts and data gathered in field

Provides a thoughtful analysis of literature review. Student connects findings to clinical concepts; however, specific quotes, principles, or theories may be lacking or examples may be used inappropriately. Connection to data gathered is not present or minimal

Provides an in-depth, critical analysis of Case Study activity findings together with appropriate literature. Candidate insightfully and appropriately connects findings to specific clinical concepts, using carefully selected quotes, principles, and/or theories cited from course readings.

May present ideas in a simplistic and/or repetitive fashion. Ideas may be marginally developed or poorly organized. Language has an accumulation of errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure.

Presents ideas in a way that shows some depth and complexity. Organization may be somewhat inconsistent. Ideas and language flow well overall, but errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure distract from the content.

Presents ideas thoughtfully and in-depth. Ideas are coherently and logically organized. Has an effective, fluent style, marked by language that is generally free from errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure.