- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: eme2040 Final Project Rubric - Sp2011

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
eme2040 Final Project Rubric - Sp2011 eme2040 Final Project Rubric - Sp2012 The final project requires you to create a four page wiki: Introduction, Lesson Plan (ASSURE Model with ABCD objectives), Student Page, and Teacher Resources. The lesson plan and resources should cover 5 days of instruction Late projects will not be accepted. Total points available 150. Rubric Code: Z695XC By gailmazyck Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Final Project
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Project Wiki
Wiki Use 1 pts	Missing Project does not utilize wiki	Poor	Fair	Good Project utilizes Wikispaces or PBWiki
Introductory Page 4 pts	Missing No introductory page included No graphic included No links included or not working	Poor Introductory page included but not clearly descriptive of the project. Graphics or links not provided, not appropriate, or not linked correctly.	Fair Introductory page provides an overview of the unit and links to the other pages. 2 or more appropriate graphics included.	Good Introductory page provides an accurate overview of the unit, links correctly to the lesson plan, student activites and teacher resources pages. Graphics are appropriate in content, size and placement. Page is appealing and engaging.
Lesson Plan
A 1 pts Analyze the learner	Missing No description of the learner	Poor Few learner characteristics are included.	Fair Most learners characteristics are included, but some key information is missing.	Good Learners are described including grade, demographics, learning styles, and background knowledge, etc.
S1 3 pts State instructional objectives in ABCD format	Missing No instructional objectives included No indication of Bloom's taxonomy included	Poor Objectives are included but do not meet the ABCD criteria Bloom's taxonomy not adequately addressed.	Fair Objectives are included but are not realistic and/or parts of the ABCD criteria are missing on one or more Bloom's taxonomy level(s) included but incorrect or only at one level.	Good Appropriate objectives are included and each meets the ABCD criteria: Audience, Behavior, Condition, Degree Multiple levels of Blooms taxonomy included and correctly identified.
S2 1 pts Specify benchmarks and standards	Missing No benchmarks or standards stated	Poor Benchmarks are included but rudimentary/not defined or too many.	Fair Benchmarks are provided, but key information is missing. At least 3 or 4 applicable standards/benchmarks are listed but are not labeled correctly Only NETS or SSS are menitoned, not both.	Good At least 3 or 4 appropriate Florida and/or national standards listed with number and text and/or source (in the case of national standards). Both Sunshine State and NETS standards for students are provided
S 2 pts Select media, methods and materials	Missing No description of media and materials included No technology included	Poor Inappropriate media, methods and technology are included and/or no explanation is provided.	Fair Appropriate media, methods and technology are included, but not described well.	Good Appropriate media, methods and technology hardware/software is fully integrated. Media implementation is described and an explanation for included Technology Standards (NETS) how media helps to meet objectives is provided.
U 2 pts Utilize media, methods and materials--What will you do?	Missing No description of how media, materials and technology will be used is included	Poor Description of media, materials and technology use is poorly written and inadequate.	Fair A utilization plan is included, but is not sufficient to fulfill lesson objectives.	Good A step-by-step plan for utilizing the media, materials and technology is included and fits the objectives for this lesson.
R 2 pts Require learner participation--What will students do?	Missing No description of what learners will do is included	Poor Individual acquisition of lesson information- groups or individuals not working together OR not using technology.	Fair A description of what the learner will do is included and group collaboration is included, but final product is individually generated	Good Individual and/or small/large group activities are planned and the lesson incorporates collaboration and/or cooperative learning.with technology as a central catalyst.
E1 2 pts Evaluate and Revise (Assessment of student learning)	Missing No statement of how student success will be measured.	Poor Criteria for student success are barely described or not related to objectives	Fair Criteria for success are at least partially described and related to the objectives.	Good The evaluation instrument clearly measures what students must know and be able to do to accomplish the task and directly related to the objectives. Criteria for success are clearly stated in the form of a rubric. Criteria include qualitative as well as quantitative descriptors.
E2 1 pts Evaluate and Revise (Reflection and revision of lesson)	Missing No plan for evaluating the instruction and revising the lesson is included.	Poor Criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the lesson are poorly explained.	Fair Criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the lesson are partially explained.	Good Criteria for measuring the effectiveness of the lesson are clearly explained. Opportunity for reflection and evaluation of teaching and lesson are included.
Clarity of Lesson 1 pts	Missing Lesson process completely missing or unclear.	Poor Lesson process is not clearly stated. Teachers would not know exactly what they were supposed to do just from reading this lesson plan.	Fair Some directions are given, but there is missing information. Teachers might be confused.	Good Every step is clearly stated. Most teachers would know exactly where they are at each step of the lesson and know what to do next.
Other Required Pages
Student Activity Page 10 pts	Missing Student activity page not included	Poor Student activity page included but instructions are unclear or students could not work on their own. Activities would take less than 5 50-minute class periods.	Fair Student activity page detailed and provides step-by-step instructions for students. Students can work on their own. Links are graphics are included. Technology integration is not clear or is not engaging.	Good Student activity page is clear and students can work on their own without assistance for about 5 days. Graphics (at least 3), links (at least 3), directions, and/or clues are interesting and enjoyable. Student activities integrate a variety of different technologies, hardware and/or software.
Teacher Resources Page 10 pts	Missing Teacher resource page is not included	Poor Teacher resources included but not appropriate, not correctly linked, or not annotated. Less than 8-10 are included.	Fair Contains at least 8 to 10 resources. Titles are correctly hyperlinked and the resources are annotated. Wikipedia Google, Yahoo, YouTube or TeacherTube, are not included as primary resources.	Good Contains at least 8 to 10 appropriate resources for teachers. The links are correctly hyperlinked (URL does not show) Words are links and open correct pages. Each resources is annotated and contains clear information about the link.
General Appeal
Spelling and Grammar 2 pts	Missing Contains more than 5 spelling, grammatical punctuation or capitalizaiton errors.	Poor Contains 2-4 spelling or grammatical errors. Contains multiple errors in punctuation or capitalization.	Fair Contains one spelling or grammatical error. Contains few or no errors in punctuation or capitalization.	Good Contians no spelling or grammatical errors. Punctuation and capitalizaiton are correct.
Appropriateness 2 pts	Missing Project is not appropriate to grade level and/or subject area.	Poor Project, language and graphics may not be appropriate for grade level or subject area.	Fair Project is appropriate for grade level and subject area, but language (reading level) is too high or too low and/or graphics are not appropriate for grade level.	Good Project, language (reading level), and graphics are appropriate for grade level and subject area.
Appearance 2 pts	Missing Project does not appear professional.	Poor Project does not use spacing between paragraphs, headings, color or white space appropriate	Fair Project uses some spacing, headings, color and white space appropriately but could use improvement	Good Project appears very professional. Uses spacing between paragraphs, appropriate fonts, headings, color and white space.
Originality 2 pts	Missing Project is not original	Poor Project appears to be adapted from another lesson plan, but no credit is given	Fair Project is loosely adapted from another lesson plan but credit is given	Good Project is original or adapted from a lesson plan with credit given and original portions added.
Sharing 1 pts	Missing Not shared WIki is private so it cannot be viewed. Instructor not invited to share and/or URL not provided in dropbox.	Poor Instructor invited to share but wiki cannot be viewed for some reason.	Fair Instructor invited but through email, not through the wiki or dropbox.	Good Instructor invited from the wiki OR URL provided..no problem in getting access to the wiki.
Reflects Class Content 1 pts	Missing No attempt is made to enhance wiki through embedding of video, audio, podcasting, glog or other resource.	Poor Embedding is attempted but not successful or appropriate. Little connection is made to projects or products discussed in the course.	Fair Appropriate embedding of media or wiki features is attempted. Projects and products discussed in the course and/or challenges are reflected in the wiki.	Good Video, audio, podcast, glog, or other resource are embedded and appropriate. Projects and products discussed in the course and/or challenges are reflected in the wiki.

Keywords:

lesson plan, ASSURE, Objectives, project, teacher education

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric