Skip to main content
iRubric: Literary Analysis Rubric

iRubric: Literary Analysis Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literary Analysis Rubric 
Literary Analysis Rubric
Rubric Code: Z68XC6
By emm1076
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Literary Analysis Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Introduction/Thesis Statement

Poor

The introduction is recognizable but no thesis statement is provided. A weak hook is present and important information is absent.
Fair

The introduction is somewhat effective. The thesis statement outlines some or all of the main points to be discussed. The hook is present though not followed by important information.
Good

The introduction includes a hook, transitions to the thesis statement, and is somewhat effective. The thesis statement is included but may need extra attention.
Excellent

The introduction includes a hook and transitions smoothly to the thesis statement. The thesis statement clearly states the theme and lists main points as well as the literary work being used.
Body/Organization

Poor

Topic sentences are absent or lack focused ideas. General or irrelevant comments about the text are used. There is no argument guiding the essay and little or no concrete details. Points of the paragraphs are unclear. Student uses little or no variety in sentence and paragraph structure.
Fair

Topic sentences are present but weak and have an unclear connection to the thesis. Contains weak concrete details that provide insufficient evidence or are irrelevant to the topic. Lack of organization in a paragraph or abrupt transitions from one paragraph to the next. Lacks constant focus and points may not be clear. Student uses some variety in sentence and paragraph structure.
Good

Topic sentences generally connect to thesis but in one or more topic sentence the main idea may need to be clarified. Concrete details are well-chosen though some may be irrelevant information. May be awkward transitions for paragraphs but student uses a variety in sentence and paragraph structure.
Excellent

Topic sentences clearly connect to thesis. Concrete details are well-chosen and are incorporated nicely. Has carefully developed and supported arguments. Student uses a great variety in sentence and paragraph structure. Maintains focus and keeps a clear point in each paragraph.
Content Knowledge

Poor

Key elements are not covered. Provides unnecessary information with no depth analysis and does not stay on topic.
Fair

Key elements are vaguely covered. Provides unnecessary information with little or no depth analysis to the proposed topic.
Good

Most key elements are covered. Provides most necessary information and for the most part relates to the proposed topic.
Excellent

All key elements are covered. Provides necessary information and has in depth analysis to the proposed topic.
Quality of Writing

Poor

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are misused enough for reader not to understand. Misspelled words detract from the work. Citations are completely innaccurate. No variety in sentence and paragraph structure whatsoever.
Fair

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are misused enough to distract reader. Many misspelled words. Citations are inaccurate. Paragraphs and sentences lack variety and are unclear.
Good

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are uses with few mistakes. A few misspelled words. Citations may have small mistakes. Paragraphs and sentences are not as clear as they could be.
Excellent

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are used with virtually no mistakes. Spelling is correct. Proper citations rules are followed. Clarity of paragraphs and sentences.
Literary Analysis

Poor

Writing demonstrates some awareness of text details but not a critical, analytical understanding of the text. Points made are vague and unsubstantiated. Essay lacks focus. No literary analysis present
Fair

Writing demonstrates basic comprehension of the text but not a critical, analytical understanding of it. Interpretive analysis inconsistent or unsubstantiated. Frequent summary of plot details that retell the story. Restates the content of cited concrete details rather than draws significant inferences about sub-textual meaning.
Good

Writing generally reflects a critical, analytical understanding of the text but is uneven. Inferences demonstrate interpretive ability but could be developed further to better explain significance of detail and support thesis and/or topic sentence. Some claims may be vague, generalized, or lacking in support.
Excellent

Writing reflects a critical, analytical understanding of the text. Through clear reasoning, insightful inferences are drawn from concrete details to support the connected ideas of the topic sentence and thesis. Claims and points made are well-supported and persuasive.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202