- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Leiningen vs. the Ants rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Leiningen vs. the Ants Beowulf Creative Projects On-line TV Broadcasting/podcasting project for class blog Rubric Code: Z34A6A By carmonwhite Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Component
	Exemplary 40 pts	Good 30 pts	Fair 20 pts	Poor 10 pts
Understanding of literary elements	Exemplary Student shows full understanding of the text and is able to easily make real-life connections to text.	Good Student shows an understanding of the text and can make some real-life connections to text.	Fair Student understands portions of the text and needs assistance to make real-life connections.	Poor Student does not understand the text and has difficulty making real-life connections.
Professionalism	Exemplary Student's work is professional, both in sound/appearance and quality of work. Student creates a newscast/talkshow that looks, feels, and sounds true to life.	Good Student's work is professional in either sound/appearance or quality of work. Student atempts to crate a newscast/talkshow that looks, feels, and sounds true to life.	Fair Student's work is either professional in sound/appearance and quality of work or the student attempts to create a newscast/talkshow that looks, feels, and sounds true to life.	Poor Student's work is neither professional in sound/appearance and quality of work nor does the student attempt to create a newscast/talkshow that looks, feels, and sounds true to life.
Creativity	Exemplary Student's work is creative, original, and fresh. The newscast/talkshow is a pleasure to view/listen to.	Good Student's work is somewhat creative and original, but feels ordinary to a large extent.	Fair Student's work is not very creative or original and feels very ordinary.	Poor Student's work is not creative, original, or fresh. Not enjoyable to view/listen to--feels mundane.
Working with Others	Exemplary Student was fully cooperative, present each day, and pulled own weight, offering help to group members as needed.	Good Student was cooperative and did not miss more than 1 day of work on the project. Student offered help if asked.	Fair Student was not overly cooperative and missed 2 days of work on the project. Student did not help other group members.	Poor Student was not cooperative and missed 3 or more days during the project work time. Student refused to help others.
Presentation Time	Exemplary 5 minutes or more	Good 3-4 minutes	Fair 2 minutes	Poor unacceptable less than 1 minute