Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Teamwork and FLL Values Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Teamwork and FLL Values Rubric
The teamwork and FLL Values Rubric assesses how well the Lego League Team works together on a given task.
Rubric Code:
YXX858
By
coreysmith
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Teamwork
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Roles & Responsibilities
Needs Improvement
No clearly-defined roles Not clear who completed which tasks and/or very uneven distribution of work Team members not collaborative Time management is poor or purely directed by the coach
Fair
Loose role assignments Uneven work distribution Team members will help each other, if asked Time management skills are weak
Good
Defined roles Work is distributed fairly – but with individual focus only Team members assist each other without being asked Team mentions learning time management
Excellent
Clearly defined roles Workload is distributed fairly and team members understand each other’s role Team members fill each other’s roles (happily!), if needed Team members give concrete examples of learning time management
Gracious Professionalism
Needs Improvement
Team members show little/no respect for each other Team members show no awareness of school/community issues Team members compete with each other to be heard during judging Team doesn’t understand the concept of gracious professionalism
Fair
Team members show limited respect for each other Team members show limited awareness of school/community issues Team is aware of gracious professionalism, but gives no concrete examples of what they have done to help others Team did not help each other/other teams
Good
Team members show respect for teammates Team members imply increased awareness of school and/or community Team members are vague about how this awareness translates into other aspects of their lives. Team implies that they have helped each other/other teams
Excellent
Team members give concrete examples of respect for teammates Team members show increased awareness of their school/community including concrete examples. Team members clearly discuss how this increased awareness transltes into other area of their lives Team members give concrete examples of how they have helped each other/others
Problem-Solving & Team Dynamics
Needs Improvement
A problem was identified, but no steps were taken to identify a solution One team member used power to reach their desired outcome One person’s ideas are used Team members working against each other Coercion and/or confrontation dominate
Fair
A problem was identified, but the chosen solution was inadequate to some team members Some team members didn’t accept the solution Simple majority had input at meetings Decisions made by simple majority without collaborative discussion Team coexists peacefully
Good
A problem was identified and there is compromise evident in the solution Team tested various solutions to solve the problem Cooperation is a dominant theme Decisions made by most of the team, however focuses on individual tasks Team collaborates well
Excellent
A problem was identified and the team worked together to find a solution Various solutions were tested and then incorporated Team accepts input from all and sses the big picture in their overall goals Team members show equality and value each other’s roles by decisions being made by the entire team Collaboration and co-ownership are dominant themes with the members recognizing interdependence
Confidence & Enthusiasm
Needs Improvement
Only one team member spoke to the judge(s) Some team members seem disinterested Most team members are disengaged
Fair
About ½ the team spoke to the judge(s) About ½ the team seems interested Members are not paying attention to one another
Good
Everyone was ready to answer at least one question from the judges(s) Most of the team appears excited and interested Members are enthusiastic, but talk over one another
Excellent
All team members speak to the judges showing confidence in themselves as well as the team Team members show equal investment in FLL Members enthusiastically work together to include each other
FLL Values
Needs Improvement
No clear enthusiasm for science, engineering or technology Team doesn’t mention new skills acquired
Fair
Some members show an interest in science, engineering or technology Limited attention paid to new skills acquired
Good
Team shows a keen interest in subject matter, but limited use of concrete examples Team implies new skills acquired
Excellent
Group articulates a clear understanding of the FLL experience Team gives concrete examples of new skills acquired and their interest in the subject areas
Keywords:
Teamwork
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.