iRubric: Personal Humorous Narrative rubric

-intro does not grab reader
-introduction does not establish the scene
-point of view is not clear or frequently shifts
-events are in random order
-details are omitted
-conclusion does not mention why the experience was meaningful

-intro is relevant to narrative
-intro partially sets the scene only indicating where or when the experience occurred
-a few noticeable shifts from first person narration occur
-some events are in chronological order
-few details are provided
-conclusion mentions why the experience is meaningful, but the connection to events is not clear to reader

-intro only partially develops the attention of the reader
-details in the intro adequately set the scene
-first person narrative is consistent with only a few minor consistencies
-most events are in chronological order
-some details make people, places and events seem real
-conclusion states why the experience is meaningful but connection between experience and reason is somewhat general

-intro grabs the reader's attention
-specific details creating a vivid picture of when and where the experience occurred
-first person point of view is clear and consistent
-all events are clearly in chronological order
-relevant details including sensory details and dialogue, elaborate on the event, making people, places, and events seem real
-conclusion clearly states why the experience why the experience is meaningful, how it changed the writer etc.