Skip to main content
iRubric: Floor Plan Project rubric

iRubric: Floor Plan Project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Floor Plan Project 
Students create and evaluate a floor plan with a "roomate" (partner)
Rubric Code: YX8352
By thornton6107
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Floor Plan Project
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Followed Directions

Poor

Seems as though directions were not read or applied. Condo dimensions are incorrect and/or furniture and architecture missing.
Fair

Assumptions of directions are evident without thoroughness. Condo dimensions are either incorrect and/or furniture and architecture not all present.
Good

Attention to direction is evident. Condo dimensions are correct. Most furniture and architecture are present and turned in on time.
Excellent

Excellent attention to direction is evident. Condo dimensions are correct. All required furniture and architecture are present and turned in on time.
Teamwork

Poor

Teamwork was not evident with partner and work was unevenly distributed among partners. Partners worked separately most days.
Fair

Teamwork was somewhat evident with partner and/or Work was unevenly distributed among partners. Partners worked separately most days.
Good

Thorough teamwork is evident with partner. Work was evenly distributed, and partners worked closely together most days.
Excellent

Thorough and outstanding teamwork evident with partner. Work was evenly distributed, and partners worked closely together daily.
Condo Layout

Poor

Lacking required rooms; serious architectural problems.
Fair

Good use of space including all required rooms; may need minor adjustment/revisions for best space utilization.
Good

Outstanding creative use of space including all required rooms.
Excellent

Outstanding creative use of space including all required rooms as well as additional features demonstrating depth of knowledge.
Circulation Patterns

Poor

Poor use of traffic flow or inability to move easily about apartment; may interrupt one or more conversation areas.
Fair

Satisfactory understanding of traffic flow indicated by placement of most furniture
Good

Good understanding of traffic flow identified. No interruptions of conversation areas.
Excellent

Excellent understanding of traffic flow identified. No interruptions of conversation areas.
Basic Areas

Poor

Failure to identify areas or did not follow directions utilizing color codes. And.or no evidence of a key
Fair

No more than 2 errors defining areas as social, private, work utilizing color codes. And/or Key if evident, but not correctly labeled
Good

Most areas accurately defined and color coded with no more than one error. Proper use of a key is evident
Excellent

All areas accurately defined and color coded accordingly. Proper use of a key is evident
Questions and Answers

Poor

Questions were not answered thoroughly and did not show consideration of thought or chapter material.
Fair

Questions were answered. Questions and/or answers are not typed
Good

All questions were answered thoroughly. All questions and answers are typed
Excellent

All questions were answered thoroughly and demonstrated depth of thought and understanding of principles discussed in chapter. All questions and answers are typed
Floor Plan Symbols

Poor

Numerous errors using floor plan symbols indicating a lack of understanding or lack of detail.
Fair

Minor errors using floor plan symbols.
Good

Successful use of most architectural symbols.
Excellent

Successful use of all architectural symbols.
Use of Classtime

Poor

Did not use class time to focus on the project or often distracted others
Fair

Used some of the time well during each class period, or some of the days. There was some focus on getting the project done, but occasionally distracted others.
Good

Used time well during each class period. Usuallly focused on getting the project done and never distracted others.
Excellent

Used time well during each class period. Focused on getting the project done. Never distracted others.
Neatness

Poor

The project is distractingly messy lacking adequate use of a pen, ruler, and color coding.
Fair

The project is acceptable, though it may be a bit messy.
Good

The project is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.
Excellent

The project is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.



Keywords:
  • floor plan, circulation patterns, traffic patterns, zones

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232