Skip to main content

iRubric: Grand Rounds Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Grand Rounds Presentation Grand Rounds Presentation In clinical groups, students will present a complete overview of the assigned chronic disease. You are assigned to present a client from one of the four clinical areas for your Grand Rounds Presentation. This is a client that you may select independently while on a clinical rotation. You will need to have two forms of media in your presentation. These can be powerpoint presentations, models of anatomy, brochures that you design, or posters that you made. The Nursing Resource Center may also prove helpful in providing equipment for your presentation. If you choose to use powerpoint, it is essential that you test your program on a college classroom computer system prior to the day of presentation to ensure that it works as you have designed. All presentations will include a question and answer portion which involves your fellow classmates. Rubric Code: YX5B7CB By skidd9 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Medical Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Grand Rounds Presentation
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 6 pts
Overall Organization & Delivery 5 pts	Poor Students presentation is unclear and unorganized. No teaching/learning form of media presented .	Fair Students presentation is fairly organized. Information presented was clear. One (1) teaching/learning form of media presented.	Good Students presentation is clear and understandable, interesting, and extremely organized. Two (2) teaching/learning forms of media.	Excellent Students presentation is excellent, is extremely organized, interesting, creative, and easy to follow. Demonstrates originality. Uses more than two (2) teaching/learning forms of media.
Clarity 5 pts	Poor The oral presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow. Poor delivery and timing of information. Did not seem to know the material. Poor discussion of questions.	Fair The oral presentation was choppy, difficult to follow. Presenter did not have a grasp on the information. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too much reading. Needs more interaction and discussion of questions.	Good The oral presentation was mostly smooth and seamless, few verbal pauses. The presenter appeared calm, had a general grasp of information. Proficient delivery and timing of information. Proficient discussion initiated/ maintained	Excellent The oral presentation was smooth and seamless. The presenter appeared calm and in command of the information. Exceptional delivery. Exceptional discussion intiated and maintained to facilitate learning
Knowledge Base 8 pts	Poor The presenter failed to interrelates the patho, diagnostic techniques, treatment and nursing interventions. Presentation of material was unclear and not related to the topic at hand.	Fair Presentation reflects some understanding of interrelation to the patho, diagnostic techniques, treatment and nursing interventions but no real understanding of its application to current nursing practice.	Good Presentation demonstrates the application to current nursing practice in a clear and concise manner, including the patho, diagnostic techniques, treatment, and nursing intervention.	Excellent Presentation demonstrates the application of the topic to current nursing practice in a clear and concise manner. Shows clear understanding of the relationship between evidence based nursing article and practice.
Participation 3 pts	Poor Participates relevantly in less than 40% of all presentations	Fair Participates relevantly in 40-69%of all presentations	Good Participates relevantly in 70--89% of all presentations	Excellent Participates relevantly in discussion of 90 - 100% of all presentations
Professional Speaking Atributes 3 pts	Poor Student had no or minimal eye contact. Students' voice was inaudible, they mumbled, or were otherwise not understood. • Heavy reliance on notes during presentation.	Fair Students occasionally used eye contact. Students' voices were difficult to hear, used "ums" or other fillers • Needs less reliance on notes.	Good Student maintained eye contact most of the time. Showed enthusiasm most of the time. Voice was clear and understandable, minimal fillers used. • Some reliance on notes.	Excellent Student excellent eye contact, showed enthusiasm through entire presentation, and was easily understood. Spoke about subject with authority and ease.
Time 3 pts	Poor Presentation lasts less 6 minutes or needs to be stopped by the instructor due to excessive time	Fair Lasts less than 8 or more than 17minutes which includes discussion and question period	Good Lasts less than 10 or more than 15 minutes which includes discussion and question period	Excellent Lasts 10-15 minutes with time devoted to questions and discussion and lead discussion.
Peer Review 3 pts	Poor Class rating is poor.	Fair Class rating is fair.	Good Class rating is good.	Excellent Class rating is excellent.

Keywords:

nursing, grand rounds, evidence based, clinical, case study

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Health rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n67