Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: BPSGT House Style rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
BPSGT House Style
BPSGT House Style
Build A Three Dimensional Home That Demonstrates A Specific Style of Architecture: Students will build a model of a home with an easily recognizable style, such as; Prairie, Ranch, Contemporary, Tudor, Queen Anne, Colonial, or Greek Revival. The student will work to make their model look authentic. They will also need to be able to describe at least 6 of the architectural features that distinguish their model as the style they are displaying.
Rubric Code:
YC2A4B
By
wattersonk
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5, 6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
BPSGT House Style
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
(N/A)
EXEMPLARY
4 pts
GOOD
3 pts
FAIR
2 pts
UNACCEPTABLE
1 pts
DID NOT COMPLETE
0 pts
SCALE
DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
All dimensions on the house plan are drawn to scale.
GOOD
Most of the dimensions on the house plan are drawn to scale.
FAIR
Many of the dimensions on the house plan are NOT drawn to scale.
UNACCEPTABLE
Most of the dimensions on the house plan are NOT drawn to scale.
DID NOT COMPLETE
No evidence of scale is present.
CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSE AND MATERIALS
DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Exterior walls of the house look authentic-bricks, stone, wood, stucco. Careful measurement and cutting is neat and accurate.
GOOD
Exterior walls of the house appear realistic, but there are some inadequacies in measurement and cutting.
FAIR
Exterior walls of the house are covered with paper. Lack of careful measurement or cutting is observable. Lines are not straight.
UNACCEPTABLE
Exterior walls of the house are painted or markers were used for color. Lack of careful measurement or cutting is obvious.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Did not choose an appropriate house style.
DRAWING
DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Drawing is accurate, neat and represents 6 or more architectural features.
GOOD
Drawing is accurate, neat and represents 4-5 architectural features, OR neatness is lacking.
FAIR
Drawing is accurate, neat and represents 2-3 architectural features, OR neatness is lacking.
UNACCEPTABLE
Drawing contains 1 or no architectural features. Lack of accuracy and neatness distract from the drawing.
DID NOT COMPLETE
No drawing is present.
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
In addition to the exterior walls and roof, 6 or more architectural features are shown that represent the chosen style.
GOOD
In addition to the exterior walls and roof, 4-5 architectural features are shown that represent the chosen style.
FAIR
In addition to the exterior walls and roof, 2-3 architectural features are shown that represent the chosen style.
UNACCEPTABLE
In addition to the exterior walls and roof, 1 architectural feature is shown that represents the chosen style.
DID NOT COMPLETE
In addition to the exterior walls and roof, no architectural features are shown that represent the chosen style.
DETAILS
DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Authentic look to features. Contains 4 pictures of houses in the same style, with sources cited.
GOOD
Authentic look to features. Contains 3 pictures of houses in the same style with sources cited.
FAIR
Authentic look to features. Contains 2 pictures of houses in the same style, with sources cited.
UNACCEPTABLE
Authentic look to features. Contains 1 picture of a house in the same style, with sources cited.
DID NOT COMPLETE
No pictures are present, or citations are incomplete.
PRESENTATION
DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Well rehearsed and appropriate voice level. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
GOOD
Prepared, but could benefit from rehearsal or voice projection. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
FAIR
Poorly prepared and/or unable to identify architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE
It is apparent that student did not rehearse the presentation prior to class.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Student chose not to present.
Keywords:
architecture
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.