Skip to main content

iRubric: BPSGT House Style rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
BPSGT House Style 
BPSGT House Style
Build A Three Dimensional Home That Demonstrates A Specific Style of Architecture: Students will build a model of a home with an easily recognizable style, such as; Prairie, Ranch, Contemporary, Tudor, Queen Anne, Colonial, or Greek Revival. The student will work to make their model look authentic. They will also need to be able to describe at least 6 of the architectural features that distinguish their model as the style they are displaying.
Rubric Code: YC2A4B
By wattersonk
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Powered by iRubric BPSGT House Style
  EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

(N/A)

EXEMPLARY

4 pts

GOOD

3 pts

FAIR

2 pts

UNACCEPTABLE

1 pts

DID NOT COMPLETE

0 pts

SCALE

DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

All dimensions on the house plan are drawn to scale.
GOOD

Most of the dimensions on the house plan are drawn to scale.
FAIR

Many of the dimensions on the house plan are NOT drawn to scale.
UNACCEPTABLE

Most of the dimensions on the house plan are NOT drawn to scale.
DID NOT COMPLETE

No evidence of scale is present.
CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSE AND MATERIALS

DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Exterior walls of the house look authentic-bricks, stone, wood, stucco. Careful measurement and cutting is neat and accurate.
GOOD

Exterior walls of the house appear realistic, but there are some inadequacies in measurement and cutting.
FAIR

Exterior walls of the house are covered with paper. Lack of careful measurement or cutting is observable. Lines are not straight.
UNACCEPTABLE

Exterior walls of the house are painted or markers were used for color. Lack of careful measurement or cutting is obvious.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Did not choose an appropriate house style.
DRAWING

DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Drawing is accurate, neat and represents 6 or more architectural features.
GOOD

Drawing is accurate, neat and represents 4-5 architectural features, OR neatness is lacking.
FAIR

Drawing is accurate, neat and represents 2-3 architectural features, OR neatness is lacking.
UNACCEPTABLE

Drawing contains 1 or no architectural features. Lack of accuracy and neatness distract from the drawing.
DID NOT COMPLETE

No drawing is present.
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES

DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

In addition to the exterior walls and roof, 6 or more architectural features are shown that represent the chosen style.
GOOD

In addition to the exterior walls and roof, 4-5 architectural features are shown that represent the chosen style.
FAIR

In addition to the exterior walls and roof, 2-3 architectural features are shown that represent the chosen style.
UNACCEPTABLE

In addition to the exterior walls and roof, 1 architectural feature is shown that represents the chosen style.
DID NOT COMPLETE

In addition to the exterior walls and roof, no architectural features are shown that represent the chosen style.
DETAILS

DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Authentic look to features. Contains 4 pictures of houses in the same style, with sources cited.
GOOD

Authentic look to features. Contains 3 pictures of houses in the same style with sources cited.
FAIR

Authentic look to features. Contains 2 pictures of houses in the same style, with sources cited.
UNACCEPTABLE

Authentic look to features. Contains 1 picture of a house in the same style, with sources cited.
DID NOT COMPLETE

No pictures are present, or citations are incomplete.
PRESENTATION

DUE WEEK OF March 3
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Well rehearsed and appropriate voice level. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
GOOD

Prepared, but could benefit from rehearsal or voice projection. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
FAIR

Poorly prepared and/or unable to identify architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE

It is apparent that student did not rehearse the presentation prior to class.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Student chose not to present.



Keywords:
  • architecture

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178