Skip to main content
iRubric: RAFT: Love Letter rubric

iRubric: RAFT: Love Letter rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
RAFT: Love Letter 
Narrative Writing
This rubric assesses a student's ability to write a RAFT(Role, Audience, Format, Topic) love letter to an equivalent fraction to 3/4.
Rubric Code: YBBWXW
By ekbdwd
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Topic
This rubric grades the ability to articulate a concept through writing.
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Generating and Comparing Fractions

This section grades on if the fractions are generated and used correctly in the story.
Poor

No fractions were correct or used correctly in the RAFT letter. The equivalent isn't equal, less than isn't less, and the greater fraction is not greater than 3/4.
Fair

Only 1 fraction is correct or used correctly in the letter. The equivalent is not equal to 3/4, the lesser fraction is not less than, or the greater fraction is not greater than 3/4.
Good

Only 2 fractions are correct and used correctly in the story. The equivalent is not equal to 3/4, the lesser fraction is not less than, or the greater fraction is not greater than 3/4.
Excellent

All fractions are used correctly. The equivalent fraction to 3/4 is equal and another way to represent it. The other two fractions are used correctly as well, one is greater than 3/4 and one is less than 3/4.
Parts of a letter

This assesses if all parts of the letter were included such as: the heading, salutation, body, closing, and signature.
Poor

At least 2 parts of the RAFT letter were used correctly.
Fair

At least 3 parts were used correctly in the RAFT letter.
Good

At least 4 parts were used correctly in the RAFT letter.
Excellent

All parts of the letter were used correctly throughout the RAFT letter.
Organization

This section grades on the how the writing is organized.
Poor

I didn't understand what you were writing about. Your paper is written in a random or illogical manner. It does not convey a sense of experience. The details did not contribute to the RAFT letter. You did not stay on topic through out your letter.
Fair

Your form or structure is evident but may not always be appropriate. The writer is able to convey a sense of experience. Some details do not contribute to the RAFT letter. You may not sustain focus.
Good

The structure of the letter is, for the most part, appropriate to the purpose and is responsive to the demands of the RAFT letter. You are able to convey your experience.
Excellent

You are able to skillfully convey your experience.All of the details contribute to the RAFT letter. You stayed on topic and maintained focus throughout the entire paper.
Development of ideas

How well did you develop your ideas in your composition?
Poor

Development of ideas are weak, inappropriate, vague, and insufficient to the story. You don't have a clear understanding of equivalent, greater, and lesser fractions.
Fair

The development of the letter is minimal and it remains at a surface level because there are few details. There is little to no thoughtfulness. There is a limited understanding of equivalent, greater, and lesser fractions.
Good

Specific details add some substance to the RAFT letter. You have a great understanding of equivalent, greater, and lesser fractions.
Excellent

Specific, well chosen details add substance to your RAFT letter. You have a deep understanding of equivalent, greater and lesser fractions. Your paper is thoughtful and engaging
Conventions

spelling, capitalization, and punctuation,
Poor

Numerous errors in spelling, capitalization, paragraphing, and punctuation,including commas and apostrophes, found in writing. These errors make it hard to understand the meaning/message of the writing due to these errors.
Fair

Frequent errors made in spelling, capitalization, paragraphing, and punctuation, including commas and apostrophes. These errors make it more difficult to understand the message or meaning of the writing. Evidence in draft shows that student attempted to make corrections to errors.
Good

Few errors were made in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation, including commas and apostrophes. Appropriate paragraphs used. Student spent ample time working on identifying and correcting editing errors.
Excellent

No errors were made in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation, including commas and apostrophes. Appropriate paragraphs used in writing.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60