Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Expository Rubric based on STAAR
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Expository Rubric based on STAAR
Rubric Code:
YB5294
By
lindatalley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Poor (1)
1 pts
Fair (2)
2 pts
Good (3)
3 pts
Well Done (4)
4 pts
Organization and Progressions
Poor (1)
Organizing structure of the essay is inappropriate to the purpose, or only marginally acceptable.
Lacks clarity and direction
Most ideas are generally related, BUT Thesis is missing
Fails to maintain focus
May shift from idea to idea
Presented ideas in random or illogical way
Fair (2)
Thesis statement is weak
Weak attempt at organization
Writer includes irrelevant information
Repetition and Wordiness may be present
Transitions and connections are too perfunctory to flow easily
Good (3)
Structure is appropriate for the expository task.
Thesis is clearly stated and focused
Progressions of ideas is logical & controlled and show the relationship of ideas
Well Done (4)
Extremely well organized
Clear thesis and all ideas are strongly related and provide focused support to topic.
Progressions of ideas is logical
Development of Ideas
Poor (1)
Development is weak
Writer uses details and examples that are inappropriate, vague or insufficient
Response is vague and confused. Essay may be weakly linked to topic.
Demonstrates lack of understanding of expository writing task
Fair (2)
Development of ideas is minimal
Details and examples are not always appropriate or are too brief
Little or no thought put into writing
Good (3)
Development of ideas is sufficient
Uses details and examples that are specific and appropriate
Reflects some thoughtfulness
Well Done (4)
Development of ideas is effective. All supportive details are relevant and add substance to the essay
Thought may be particularily insightful
Use of Language/Conventions
Poor (1)
Word choice may be vague or limited
Little or no awareness of expository purpose
Sentences are simplistic, awkward,uncontrolled
little or no command of conventions
Mistakes disrupt reader's understanding
Fair (2)
Word choice may be general or imprecise
Does not establish anappropriate tone
Sentences are awkward
Writer has only a partial comand of the conventions of lang. Disruptions are distracting to the reader
Good (3)
Word choice is clear and specific and contributes to the quality of the essay.
Sentences are varied and adequately controlled
Demonstrates adequate command of the conventions of lang.
No disruptons to flow
Well Done (4)
Word choice is purposeful and precise
Sentences are purposeful, varied, and well controlled.
Excellent command of the conventions of lang. although may contain minor errors.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.