Skip to main content
iRubric: Science Experimental Design rubric

iRubric: Science Experimental Design rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Science Experimental Design 
Using materials provided by the teacher, students design, create, and conduct their own experiment.They will collect data, organize it, and draw valid conclusions. They will use their data to support their conclusions.
Rubric Code: YAA4BW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Science Experiment
  Novice

5 pts

Apprentice

10 pts

Practitioner

15 pts

Expert

20 pts

Science Writing Quality

Materials list and Procedure

Novice

-Writing is weak and lacks science vocabulary.
-Thoughts are scattered and poorly developed; -Many spelling and/or grammatical errors
Apprentice

-Writing is fair and uses little science vocabulary.
-Few thoughts are developed, most are short and not fully developed
-Few spelling and/or grammatical errors
Practitioner

-Writing is good and uses some science vocabulary.
-Follows logical steps. -Thoughts are more developed.
-Very few spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Expert

-Writing is excellent and uses a variety of science vocabulary.
-Explanations are clear and thoughts are well developed.
-No spelling or grammatical errors.
Hypothesis

Novice

-Does not state any sort of prediction of the outcome
-Does not have the form If, Then, Because.
Apprentice

-Has a prediction, but it is not scientifically defended and is not in form of an If, Then, Because statement
Practitioner

-Prediction is clear, but is missing some of the If, Then, Because format.
Expert

-Prediction is clear and defended with scientific reasoning in the form of an If, Then, Because statement.
Variables

Novice

-Independent and dependent variables are not identified
Apprentice

-Independent and dependent variables identified, but are reversed.
Practitioner

Both independent and dependent variables are identified, but some details are missing.
Expert

Both variables correctly identified and explained with details.

Specificity is used!
Data Table

Novice

-Data collection was incomplete.
-Data appears inaccurate
-Some columns and rows have titles
-Very difficult to read and follow.
Apprentice

-Includes a title and labels for rows and/or columns.
-Data appears accurate and complete may be missing some units
-Well organized, can read most entries
Practitioner

-Includes columns and rows and a title.
-All data appears accurate and includes necessary units
-Well organized, can read all entries
Expert

-Includes neat columns and rows and a title.
-All data appears accurate and includes all necessary units
-Very well organized, can easily read all entries
Graph

Novice

-Graph contains many errors or inaccuracies.
-Titles and labels are missing as are units
-Scale and intervals are inconsistent
-Data plotted incorrectly
Apprentice

-Some errors or inaccuracies are present.
-Intervals for each axis of the graph are consistent. -Data is not shown correctly
Practitioner

-Few errors are present; -Intervals for each axis of the graph are consistent.
-No title given for the graph
-Data is shown correctly
Expert

-No errors are present. -Intervals for each axis of the graph are consistent and correct for the data collected.
-Descriptive title provided
-Data is shown correctly
Conclusion

Where is the evidence?

Novice

-No summary of experiment given
-Explanations are not clear/accurate
-Data is not used in the conclusion
-Hypothesis is not mentioned
-No suggestions for further research given
Apprentice

-Summary of experiment provided, but not clear
-Explanations are not fully clarified
-data is mentioned but is not connected to the conclusion provided
-Hypothesis is not evaluated
-suggestions for further research is not connected to the experiment conducted
Practitioner

-Summary of experiment is provided
-Explanations are accurate.
-Data is used to support conclusion
-Hypothesis is evaluated using data for support
-Suggestions for further research connected to the experiment conducted.
Expert

-Summary of experiment is thorough and claerly written
-Expanations are fully clarified and accurate.
-Data is used specifically to support conclusion
-Hypothesis is clearly evaluated and data is used for support
-Suggestions for further research is insightful and well connected to the conclusion from the experiment



Keywords:
  • scientific method, independent and dependent variables, controls

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60