Skip to main content

iRubric: Individual Expertise Brief for Antigone/Creon Tria rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Individual Expertise Brief for Antigone/Creon Tria 
Individual Expertise Brief for Antigone/Creon Tria
Students worked together to build a case in defense of their client, Antigone or Creon.
Rubric Code: Y9B7BX
By dramalori1
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Individual Expertise Case Brief
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

This assignment is polished, meets or exceeds all requirements

25 pts

Good

This assignment meets most of the requirements.

22 pts

Fair

This assignment may be lacking some critical required elements.

18 pts

Poor

This assignment is incomplete and is missing critical elements.

15 pts

Format

MLA format, Works cited page, clean, neat work.
Excellent

The brief is in proper MLA format with a heading, header, 12pt font type, and proper parenthetical citations. The works cited list is also proper format. The brief is neat, well organized, and easy to read. It meets the two page requirement not including the works cited page.
Good

The brief is predominantly in MLA format with a few minor errors. The student used parenthetical citations to support his/her arguments but there may be some errors in format. The brief meets the two page requirement.
Fair

The brief has several errors in format and citation. The brief may be slightly under the two page requirement.
Poor

The student should review MLA format and speak to the teacher to answer any questions one may have. This brief does not meet the two page requirement.
Content and ideas

Arguments, citations, Explanations from reliable sources.
Excellent

The expert brief presents persuasive arguments defending the client. Each argument stated is supported with evidence from the text or other research from a reliable source. The evidence is relevant, pointed, and clearly connected to the originally argument. The brief explains and connects how the evidence supports one's arguments.
Good

The brief presents some persuasive arguments but may have some weaknesses in logic or explanation. Most of the arguments are supported with evidence and explained but some plotsummary is used instead of analysis.
Fair

The student presents arguments that are faulty because they are insufficiently supported with evidence from the text. Or, some sources are questionable.
Poor

The arguments are unclear and lacking organization. They are not supported by evidence from the text. Mainly summary.
Grammar and Spelling

Pithy and Cogent. Error free.
Excellent

Virtually error free. The paper has been revised and proof-read.
Good

The brief contains a few errors but it does not distract from the student's arguments.
Fair

The brief contains several errors that may be distracting to the reader.
Poor

There are multiple errors which are distracting and make it difficult to comprehend.



Keywords:
  • Case Brief

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178