Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Colon Cancer Case Study rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Colon Cancer Case Study
This rubric will be used to assess each group's colon cancer case study report
Rubric Code:
Y9437C
By
juculley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
4 pts
Organization
1 pts
Enter description
Poor
Report is disorganized and lacking appropriate sections, indenting, tables, etc. Report is difficult to read and has a haphazard or "slapped together" look. Images, tables and figures may be in random locations and may be difficult to read.
Fair
Report is decently formatted and marginally readable but has some issues regarding indenting, section headings and overall visual appeal. Could use more effort towards creating a cleaner, more professional look. Tables, images and figures may be difficult to read.
Good
Report is organized, has all relevant section headings, is indented appropriately and has a clean, professional look. Images, tables and other figures are placed in appropriate locations and are sized appropriately and clearly visible.
BLAST/ORF
2 pts
Enter description
Poor
BLAST and ORF may be missing completely with regards to the reports and images necessary for the case study. Little or no effort spent on analysis of these data. Conclusions are either completely off-base or lacking any background or supporting evidence.a
Fair
BLAST and ORF are present but the images and/or reports may not be complete. Some effort made to draw appropriate conclusions from the data, but more background information is needed or greater detail is needed in the answers.
Good
BLAST and ORF are present with all relevant images and reports. Analysis of these data is comprehensive within the scope of the case study and answers to questions are of appropriate length and detail including relevant background information.
Background
1 pts
Enter description
Poor
Patient Hx, introduction and any other important background material may either be missing or treated so informally and with so little detail as to be almost useless to the reader.
Fair
Patient Hx, introduction and other important background information is present but could use more detail to prepare the reader for the rest of the case study.
Good
Patient Hx, introduction and other important background information is present and in sufficient detail to adequately prepare the reader for the remainder of the case study report.
Definitions
2 pts
Poor
Vocabulary terms, diagnostic tests and other relevant vocabulary words are not defined. this section may actually be missing. If present, definitions are either completely lacking detail or are missing too many terms to be of real use.
Fair
Vocabulary terms, diagnostic tests and other relevant vocabulary words are defined, but may be missing a couple of terms. Additionally, the definitions could use some improvement relative to detail and relevance to the case.
Good
Vocabulary terms, diagnostic tests and other relevant vocabulary words are clearly defined with enough detail and case relevance to be of use to the reader.
Case Study Qs
2 pts
Poor
Questions in the case study are either missing completely or answered in terms so simplistic as to lack all evidence of deeper thought. Little, if any, background or outside information is brought to bear on the answers.
Fair
Case study questions are answered, but may lack enough detail to indicate the level of thought expected of honors level students. Some background or outside information is brought to bear on the answers, but more would have been better.
Good
Case study questions are answered with enough detail to clearly indicate detailed thought. Relevant outside and background information is referenced in the answers in appropriate amounts to facilitate complete answers.
Citations
1 pts
Poor
All citations may be either missing or, if present, provided with no attention to organization or appropriate formatting. There are no in-paper citations, only end of paper references.
Fair
Citations and references are present, but may be too few in number and/or may be lacking all evidence at correct organization and formatting. In-paper citations as well as end of paper references are present.
Good
Both in-paper citations and end of paper references are present. All citations and references are organized and formatted correctly. Citations and references are present in sufficient numbers.
Housekeeping
1 pts
Poor
Cover page with required group information is either missing or filled out incorrectly. Paper is not submitted in the proper format or to the proper location.
Fair
Cover page with required group information is present. It may have one or two small items that are questionable. Paper is submitted in the proper format, but some minor directions may not be followed. Paper is submitted to the proper location.
Good
Cover page with required group information is present and accurate. Paper is submitted in the proper format with all directions followed. Paper is submitted to the proper location.
Group work
1 pts
Poor
Group is either totally dysfunctional when working together or has serious issues. Little or no effort is spent organizing information to be shared among group members. Communication between group members is either totally lacking or minimal. Group lacks focus in class and gives little evidence of being on task.
Fair
Group has some issues with regards to working together. Some effort is spent organizing information to be shared between group members, but some gaps still occur. Communication between group members is decent but could definitely be improved. Group is mostly on task in class but may have occasional focus issues.
Good
Group works well together. Information is well organized to share between group members. Communication between group members is efficient and effective. Group is on task in class and has no focus issues.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.