Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Debate 2011 Final Exam rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Debate 2011 Final Exam
Debate 2011 Final Exam
This rubric is designed to score your ability to buiild an opening statement about the given topic. Your success will depend on your incorporation of ethos, pathos, and logos that you have learned as well as your ability to support your argument logically.
Rubric Code:
Y93C34
By
peterbelfry
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Exam
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Opening Statement
Excellent
17 pts
Good
16 pts
Fair
14 pts
Some Improvement
12 pts
A Lot of Improvement
10 pts
Unacceptable
0 pts
Introduction of Statement
Excellent
Does a good job of grabbing attention, relating to the audience, stating a clear thesis statement/previewing major points, and provides a smooth transition into the body of the speech.
Good
The introduction does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Fair
The introduction does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Some Improvement
The introduction is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
A Lot of Improvement
There is an introduction, but it is lacking all of the requirements needed for an effective introduction.
Unacceptable
Introduction was not present; speaker started with the body of his/her speech.
Body of Statement
Excellent
Provides clear, organized support of the thesis statement (evidence); transitional statements are used to allow the speaker to moves smoothly from one point to the next; speaker continues to keep audience attn. by using interesting language.
Good
The body does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Fair
The body does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Some Improvement
The body is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
A Lot of Improvement
The body is missing 4 of the 5 requirements for an effective body and an excellent rating.
Unacceptable
The body was not present and the speaker did not support an argument presented in the thesis statement.
Conclusion of statement
Excellent
Does an excellent job of restating the purpose, and summarizing the major points; it connects with the audience; the speaker calls the audience to take action; the speaker ends with a lasting closing statement that leaves the audience satisfied.
Good
The conclusion does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Fair
The conclusion does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Some Improvement
The conclusion is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
A Lot of Improvement
The conclusion is missing 4 of the 5 requirements for an excellent rating.
Unacceptable
The conclusion was not present; the speaker ended by stating something like, "that's it; that's the end."
Persuasive Structure/Technique
Excellent
Does an excellent job of covering the material/answering possible questions; uses a mature level of presentation skills; uses a logical argument; appeals to audience (needs); uses all appeals of reason
Good
The student does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating. Uses two of the three appeals to reason
Fair
The student does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating. Uses one of the the three appeals of reason
Some Improvement
The student is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating. Confuses the meanings of the appeals to reason
A Lot of Improvement
The student is missing 4 of the five requirements for an excellent rating. Doesn't include any of the appeals of reason
Unacceptable
The student was not persuasive and did not present a mature logical argument.
Effectiveness
Excellent
The student was enthusiastic and passionate about the charity and points he/she wanted the audience to understand
Good
The student does all but one of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Fair
The student does all but two of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Some Improvement
The studentr is missing 3 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
A Lot of Improvement
The student is missing 4 of the requirements needed to earn an excellent rating.
Unacceptable
The statement seemed as if the student was just writing anything that he/she could think of just to complete the assignment.
Subjects:
Communication
(General)
Types:
Exam
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.