iRubric: LD Case Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
LD Case Rubric Rubric to grade LD Debate Cases for beginning Debate Class Rubric Code: Y79XAW By tami_parker Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

LD Debate Case Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 5 pts	Good 9 pts
Introduction	Poor No introduction	Fair Introduction is minimal	Good Introduction is well thought out complete
Resolution	Poor Resolution is not given	Fair	Good Resolution is given
Value	Poor No Value is given	Fair Value is given but there is not fully explained	Good Value is given and fully explained
Value Criterion	Poor No Value Criterion is given	Fair Value Criterion is given but not fully explained or linked to value	Good Value Criterion is given; it is fully explained and linked to value
Definitions	Poor No definitions given	Fair Definitions are given but no source is given for definitions or the source used for definitions is not credible	Good Definitions are given from a credible source
Contentions	Poor 1 Contention	Fair 2 or 3 somewhat developed contentions	Good 2 or 3 fully contentions
Contentions	Poor No Contentions	Fair Contentions are somewhat developed, but are missing one or more elements: claim; warrant (evidence) and/or impact (why evidence proves claim or why it is important)	Good Contentions are fully developed containing all three elements of a full argument: claim; warrant (evidence) and/or impact (why evidence proves claim or why it is important)
Sub Points	Poor 0 or 1 subpoint per contention	Fair 2 fully developed subpoints per contention	Good 3 fully developed subpoints per contention
Evidence	Poor Evidence is not used.	Fair Evidence is used, but sources are not given or are not credible	Good Great evidence - credible sources
Analysis/Impact	Poor Evidence, Contentions or Claims are not analyzed or impact is not given	Fair There is an attempt to analyze evidence or show impact of evidence, but it is not fully analyzed.	Good Analysis/Impacts of evidence is fully completed. No doubt in reader or judges mind as to the importance of evidence.
Ask for the Vote	Poor Does not ask for the aff or neg vote	Fair	Good Asks for the aff or neg vote