Skip to main content

iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO302 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO302 Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO302 Rubric Code: Y7594A By drlcampanelli Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Component 40 %
	High Distinction 100-85% (N/A)	Distinction 84-75% (N/A)	Credit 74-65% (N/A)	Pass 64-50% (N/A)	Fail Below 50% (N/A)
Introduction 20 %
Introduction 10 % Introduces and succinctly clarifies the situation faced by the grieving client.	High Distinction Evidence of ability to interpret and understand the issues presented in the case study and summarise them succinctly and accurately.	Distinction Evidence of ability to understand and analyse the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with some problems with clarity.	Credit Evidence of understanding the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with many problems with clarity.	Pass Reproduced the case study details only, and many problems with clarity.	Fail No evidence of ability to understand or succinctly define the case study.
Introduction 10 % Provides an overview definition of the client's complicated grief issues and the approach that should be taken.	High Distinction A succinct and clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay is given, including the relevant theories and ideas to be discussed.	Distinction A clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, including the relevant thories and ideas to be discussed, with some problems with clarity and writing.	Credit An introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, including the relevant thories and ideas to be discussed, but with many problems with clarity and writing.	Pass An introduction is offered, but with some errors in clarity of what the paper will be written on, and many problems with writing.	Fail No summary of overview and focus of essay offered.
Main Body 55 %
Main Body 20 % Theories, concepts and ideas of approach chosen match effectively with client's complicated grief issues.	High Distinction Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the grieving client effectively, and communicate this succinctly.	Distinction Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the grieving client, and communicate these effectively.	Credit Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas which attempt to match the issues of the grieving client.	Pass Evidence of ability to reproduce appropriate theories, concepts and ideas which attempt to match the issues of the grieving client, but with many problems accurately communicating them.	Fail No evidence of knowledge of appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the client.
Main Body 20 % An insightful explanation of key links between issues faced by the grieving client and the relevant therapeutic approach is provided.	High Distinction Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate and relevant psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the grieving client are made, and this is communicated succinctly.	Distinction Evidence of ability to identify appropriate psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the grieving client are made, and this is communicated succinctly.	Credit Evidence of ability to identify appropriate psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the grieving client are made, and this is not clearly communicated.	Pass Evidence of ability to reproduce psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the client are made, but with many problems linking the issues with strategies, and with communicating these links.	Fail No evidence of knowledge of relevant psychotherapeutic strategies for the presenting issues of the client.
Main Body 15 % Comprehensive citation of relevant literature sources are provided.	High Distinction Comprehensive citation of relevant literature sources are made.	Distinction Most citations of relevant literature sources are made.	Credit Some citations of relevant literature sources are made.	Pass Few citations of relevant literature sources are made.	Fail No evidence of sourcing and citing appropriate literature sources are found.
Conclusion 15 %
Conclusion 10 % A succinct and precise summary of the relevant issues faced by the grieving client and their relevance to key theoretical ideas have been made.	High Distinction A succinct and precise summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and the key theories are given.	Distinction A succinct summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and the key theories are given.	Credit A summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and key theories are given.	Pass A weak summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and theories are given.	Fail No summary of essay offered.
Conclusion 5 % Effective recommendations for the client, with regard to possible solutions and/or future directions, are made.	High Distinction A succinct and precise summary of the appropriate recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions are given.	Distinction A succinct summary of the appropriate recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions are given.	Credit A summary of the appropriate recommendations and future directions or solutions are given.	Pass A weak summary of the recommendations are given, but may not include any solutions and/or future directions.	Fail No summary of recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions given.
Overall Quality of Paper 10 %
Overall Quality of Paper 5 % Quality of writing style	High Distinction Evidence of excellent essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.	Distinction Evidence of good essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.	Credit Evidence of satisfactory essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.	Pass Evidence of some essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.	Fail No evidence of essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Overall Quality of Paper 5 % Use of APA formatting and referencing.	High Distinction Accurate use of APA 6th ed. formatting and referencing used throughout the essay.	Distinction Good use of APA 6th ed. formatting and referencing used throughout the essay.	Credit Satisfactory use of APA 6th ed. formatting and referencing used throughout the essay.	Pass Evidence of use of APA 6th ed. formatting and referencing used throughout the essay.	Fail No evidence of use of APA formatting.

Keywords:

case study, counselling

Subjects:

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Humanities rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178