Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: GSU-2210-01 Research Experiment & Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
GSU-2210-01 Research Experiment & Presentation
RESEARCH PAPER GUIDELINES The research paper is to be 4-6 pages, double-spaced and must cite a minimum of three academic sources using MLA format. Grades will be assigned using points based on: 1. Adherence to scientific methodology, 2. Communication of research findings, summary conclusions, and considerations for future research, and 3. Accuracy in spelling, grammar, and MLA format. RESEARCH PRESENTATION GUIDELINES Each student will be allotted five minutes to present and will be graded on clear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and findings.
Rubric Code:
Y564BX
By
dmlovaglia
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Research Experiment & Presentation
Poor
220 pts
Fair
240 pts
Good
265 pts
Excellent
300 pts
Research Methodology
12 %
Poor
No observable adherence to scientific method; absence of theory or hypothesis as basis for research.
Fair
Adherence to scientific method unclear; theory and/or hypothesis briefly explained.
Good
Identifiable use of scientific method; clear explanation of experiment's theory and hypothesis.
Excellent
Strong adherence to scientific method; hypothesis and experiment based upon psychological topic and/or prior tested theory.
Data Collection & Analysis
12 %
Poor
No explanation of data collection method; absense of research results.
Fair
Unclear approach to data collection; possible bias identified in research results; presumably high "margin of error" in analysis.
Good
Cursory understanding of observation and/or survey method; unbiased evaluation of research results; low "margin of error" probable.
Excellent
Well-informed use of observation and/or survey to collect data; unbiased evaluation of research results; potential "margin of error" accounted for.
Literature Review
12 %
Poor
No academic sources used and/or cited.
Fair
Less than three academic sources used to support research topic and data; substitution of academic sources with basic web research.
Good
Three academic sources used to validate research topic and data.
Excellent
Informative use of three academic sources to substantiate the theory, hypothesis and/or research findings.
Summary of Findings
12 %
Poor
Unreasonable correlations made between data sets; leap of logic to causation, errors of fact or judgment.
Fair
One considerable (and potentially plausible) correlation provided; summary includes leap of logic to causation and/or errors of fact.
Good
One or more plausible correlation between data sets explained; no assuptions regarding causation.
Excellent
Several plausible correlations between data sets clearly explained; assumptions regarding causation avoided; strategic use of charts and illustrations.
Considerations for Future Research
12 %
Poor
No considerations for future research provided.
Fair
One possible hypothesis or practical application provided; unclearly or unthoroughly described.
Good
One or more theoretical hypotheses and/or practical applications provided for use in future research.
Excellent
Explanation of two or more theoretical hypotheses or practical applications for use in future research.
Conventions, Style & Length
7 %
Poor
Multiple spelling and/or punctuation errors; poor grammar and sentence structure; lack of flow/outline of content; MLA style not adhered to; more than one page shorter/longer than 4-6 pages.
Fair
Some spelling and/or punctuation errors; fair grammar and sentence structure; unclear flow/outline of content; inconsistent adherence to MLA style; one page shorter/longer than 4-6 pages.
Good
Minor spelling and/or punctuation errors; good grammar and sentence structure; clear flow/outline of content; mostly consistent adherence to MLA style; no more than halfpage shorter/longer than 4-6 pages in length.
Excellent
0-2 spelling and/or punctuation errors; excellent grammar and sentence structure; strong flow/outline of content; consistent adherence to MLA style; 4-6 pages in length.
In-Class Presentation
33 %
Poor
Unclear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and findings.
Fair
Thorough but unclear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and/or findings.
Good
Clear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and findings.
Excellent
Creative and clear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and findings.
Subjects:
Psychology
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Psychology rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.