Skip to main content

iRubric: Full Process Persuasive Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Full Process Persuasive Essay 
This rubric evaluates the completeness, organization, and correctness of a full process persuasive essay.
Rubric Code: Y427WA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Persuasive Essay
Evaluates the full process paper, written to convince.
  Unscorable

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

Fair

15 pts

Good

25 pts

First Rough Draft

A first attempt to fully write out information and/or explanation in an organized, presentable manner. Position statement is the first sentence, persuasive thesis ends the first paragraph.

Unscorable

Rough Draft is missing, illegible, or off-topic.
Poor

Rough draft is poorly organized, with no clear introduction and/or conclusion. Transitions are sparce. The position statement or the persuasive thesis is missing. The supporting details are not logically located close to other information on the same subtopic. The writer may get off topic occasionally.
Fair

Rough Draft is mostly organized and has at least an introduction and a body. Both position statement and persuasive thesis are present. The conclusion is present, but might be lacking in either summary or directive to reader. Some of the indentations may be missing or one or two pieces of information out of order. The writer is on topic.
Good

The rough draft is well organized. All paragraphs are clearly either indented or blocked. An introduction and a conclusion are both recognizable. Both are concise and clear. Effective transitions are used throughout. Body paragraphs are present and are developed uniformly. The writer stays on topic throughout. Vocabulary choices are mature and concise.
Revision & Editing

Looking at the rough draft with the eyes of a reader and evaluator in order to improve clarity, organization, conciseness, and correctness.

Unscorable

Both self and peer editing are missing, illegible, or extremely sparce.
Poor

Some attempt to review and correct the essay is present, but is not helpful. Most errors are still undetected or are inaccurate. No contrasting color ink was used to differentiate editing from corrections made while writing.
Fair

Review and correction are evident by either peer or the writer, but not both. Ink of a contrasting color was used to edit and comment in order to make suggestions for further improvement noticeable. Many errors are indicated and corrected accurately.
Good

Review and correction are evident by both writer and at least one peer. Ink of a contrasting color is used for corrections. Most errors are indicated and corrected accurately.
Pre-Writing

A documentation of the planning stage of writing. Shows idea formulation and organization. Includes proposition and position statement.

Unscorable

Pre-Write is missing, illegible, or off-topic.
Poor

Pre-Write is present, and on topic, but shows little in the way of effort. Persuasive thesis and/or position statement is unclear or missing. Topic has not been explored enough with support details and has no organizational categories of information for the planned five paragraphs.
Fair

Pre-Write is present and shows some effort. The propositon and position statements are indicated.The topic has enough supporting details, but shows no helpful means of organizing the information into categories for the five different paragraphs.
Good

The Pre-Write is present, is rich with details that are organized into categories of information. The position statement and persuasive thesis are both present and clear.The pre-write is recognizable as either a freewrite, a chart, a brainstorm list, an outline, or a cluster.
Second Draft

Ready for final draft, it is the product of much editing, reviewing, and rewriting.

Unscorable

Second draft is missing, illegible, or is simply a neat, but otherwise unimproved copy of the rough draft.
Poor

Second draft has been rewritten, but still contains many uncorrected errors in the targeted areas of conventions of writing and organization. Much improvement is needed in presentation.
Fair

Second draft has been rewritten to eliminate many of the errors in the targeted areas of conventions of writing and of organization. The paper is fairly well presented in terms of neatness and legibility.
Good

Second draft is neat and legible. It has followed the prescribed organizational pattern and has most of the targeted conventions of writing and organization corrected from the rough draft.
Enter Title

Unscorable
Poor
Fair
Good



Keywords:
  • persuasive, proposition, position statement, essay, full process, pre-write, rough draft, final draft

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178