Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Forensic Science Exam Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Forensic Science Exam Project
Forensic Science Exam Project
A mystery written by forensic science students for their final exam project.
Rubric Code:
Y3A6X7
By
lbichler
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Writing Portion
Poor
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Setting
Poor
There is no description of the setting other than a mention of where the story takes place.
Fair
The setting is briefly described with little detail. The setting is not realistic
Good
Setting is described in some detail. The reader has a sense of where the action takes place. The setting is mostly realistic and true
Excellent
Setting is described in full detail. It is easy to understand where action takes place. Setting is realistic and true
Character
Poor
Characters are not developed and are not realistic. There are not atleast three main characters.
Fair
Characters are developed only slightly. Characters are not very realistic or believable. Characters have little personaility. There are not atleast three main characters.
Good
Characters are mostly developed. Characters are mostly realistic and believable. Characters have some personality and depth. There are atleast three main characters.
Excellent
Characters are fully developed. Characters are realistic and believable. Characters have personaility and depth. There are atleast three main characters.
Dialogue
Poor
Dialogue is present in 10% or less of the story and is not formatted correctly.
Fair
Dialogue is present in 15% of the story but is not formatted correctly
Good
Dialogue is present in 20% of the story and is formatted correctly.
Excellent
Dialogue is present in 25% or more of the story and is formatted correctly.
Mystery
Poor
There is little to no element of mystery to the story.
Fair
There is a small element of mystery in the story but it is not the main part of the story.
Good
There is an element of mystery through most of the story. The story is solid and follows some principles of mystery.
Excellent
There is a great elelment of mystery throughout the entire story. The story is well built and follows principles of mystery.
Plot
Poor
The plot is not developed and follows no specific path.
Fair
The plot is loosely developed and has many holes. It does not follow a path.
Good
The plot is mostly developed with some holes. It follows a specific path.
Excellent
The plot is fully developed and follows a specific path from beginning to end.
Sequence
Poor
The story does not follow a sequence, is not believable and doesn't make sense.
Fair
The story barely follows a logical sequence. It makes little sense and is not very believable.
Good
The story mostly follows a logical sequence, makes sense and is mostly believable.
Excellent
The story follows a logical sequence, makes sense and is believable.
Length
Poor
Story is 2 or fewer pages, typed, double spaced.
Fair
Story is 2-3 pages, typed, double spaced.
Good
Story is 3 -4 pages, typed, double spaced.
Excellent
Story is 4 -5 pages typed, double spaced.
Grammar
Poor
Standard rules of grammar and spelling are not followed and there are many mistakes.
Fair
Standard rules of grammar and spelling are loosely followed and have many mistakes.
Good
Standard rules of grammar and spelling are followed but with several mistakes.
Excellent
Standard rules of grammar and spelling are followed with very few mistakes.
Science Portion
Poor
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Good
15 pts
Excellent
20 pts
Description of Evidence
Poor
The story includes at least 2 different pieces of evidence that are described, but not in great detail, and may or may not pertain to the plot of the story.
Fair
The story includes at least 3 different pieces of evidence that are described, but not in great detail, and may or may not pertain to the plot of the story.
Good
The story includes at least 4 different pieces of evidence that are described in detail and that pertain to the plot of the story.
Excellent
The story includes at least 5 different pieces of evidence that are described in detail and that pertain to the plot of the story.
Evidence Collection
Poor
The story describes the proper techniques for collecting evidence including how the scene is combed for evidence, specifically how the evidence is collected and the type of containers it is put into, how the evidence is logged/documented, and how the crime scene is documented. Five or more details are missing from the story.
Fair
The story describes the proper techniques for collecting evidence including how the scene is combed for evidence, specifically how the evidence is collected and the type of containers it is put into, how the evidence is logged/documented, and how the crime scene is documented. Three or four details are missing from the story.
Good
The story describes the proper techniques for collecting evidence including how the scene is combed for evidence, specifically how the evidence is collected and the type of containers it is put into, how the evidence is logged/documented, and how the crime scene is documented. One or two details are missing from the story.
Excellent
The story describes the proper techniques for collecting evidence including how the scene is combed for evidence, specifically how the evidence is collected and the type of containers it is put into, how the evidence is logged/documented, and how the crime scene is documented.
Evidence Analysis
Poor
The description of evidence analysis for three or more pieces of evidence is not detailed or includes scientifically inaccurate information.
Fair
The description of evidence analysis for pieces of evidence is not detailed or includes scientifically inaccurate information.
Good
The description of evidence analysis for one piece of evidence is not detailed or includes scientifically inaccurate information.
Excellent
Clear and scientifically accurate descriptions are given for the analysis of every piece of evidence collected.
Keywords:
creative, writing, mystery
Subjects:
English
Science
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.