Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Feature Article Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Feature Article Rubric
Journalism Article Rubric
Evaluates the completeness and quality of your article.
Rubric Code:
Y25668
By
nickmarin
Draft
Private Rubric
Subject:
Journalism
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Feature article
Poor
4 pts
Fair
12 pts
Good
20 pts
Journalistic value
Poor
No tip off of what the story is about (nutgraph).
Story is written subjectively. Writer's assertions are not supported.
Opinion and facts are blurred.
Story contains no sources or sources are not credible or relevant.
Story lacks human interest.
Fair
Weak nutgraph.
Story is written objectively, but with some subjectivity.
Some assertions are supported.
Opinions and facts on sometimes blurred.
Story contains some sources and the sources are fairly credible and relevant.
Story has some human interest.
Good
There is a strong sense of what the story is about. Strong nutgraph.
Story is written objectively.
Writer's assertions are supported.
Opinion and fact are clearly delineated.
Story contains required number of sources and sources are credible and relevant.
Story has a great deal of human interest.
Writing
Poor
The story does not contain a hook -- it does not catch the reader's interest in the lead.
The story lacks a clear point.
Story lacks places throughout where readers stop and take notice.
Story leaves the reader feeling disappointed.
Fair
The story begins with a lead that is mildly interesting. A reader might be hooked.
The story contains a point, but it is not strong.
The story contains some places where readers stop and take notice, but not enough to keep interest.
Story leaves the reader glad that they are over.
Good
The story has a good hook -- begins with good lead.
Story contains a strong point.
The story contains plenty of places where readers stop and take notice.
Story leave the reader satisfied and wanting more.
Style
Poor
Story lack details.
Tone is not well established.
Story lacks description.
Story lacks observations.
Fair
Story contains details, but they are neither specific nor concrete.
Tone is established but does not match story's subject matter..
Story contains some description.
Story provides observations, but they are not relevant.
Good
Story contains specific, concrete details.
Tone strongly established.
Story abounds in description that involves all five senses.
Story provides relevant observations.
Interviews
Poor
Interviewee is not a source that readers will relate to.
Interviews lacks quotes.
Quotes are poorly handled.
Fair
Readers may relate to the interviewee, but may not.
Interviews contains some strong quotes.
Quotes are handled fairly well.
Good
Interviewee is someone that readers can relate to.
Interviews contain very strong quotes.
Quotes are handled well.
Organization
Poor
Story lacks strong structure.
Material is not organized into coherent themes.
Reader never has a sense of time or place.
Story has no/weak conclusion
Fair
Story has structure that could be improved.
Material is somewhat organized into coherent themes.
Themes may be somewhat weak.
Reader sometimes does not have sense of time or place.
Story has OK conclusion.
Good
Story has strong structure.
Material is not organized into coherent themes.
Reader never has a sense of time or place.
Story has strong conclusion.
Common Mistakes
Poor
Multiple generalizations.
Multiple examples of writing in the passive voice passive voice.
Verb tenses are inconsistent.
Spelling mistakes abound.
Stories are full of vague words.
Grammar mistakes abound.
Poor word usage.
Bad syntax.
Fair
Some generalizations.
Some passive voice.
In some cases, verb tenses are inconsistent.
Some spelling mistakes.
Stories contain some vague words.
There are some grammar mistakes.
Some poor word usage.
Occasional bad syntax.
Good
No generalizations.
Written in active voice.
Verb tenses are consistent.
No spelling mistakes are made.
Stories omit vague words.
Grammar is sound.
Good word usage.
Good syntax
Subjects:
Journalism
Types:
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Journalism rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Add to Gallery
Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.