Skip to main content

iRubric: Economic Position Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Economic Position Paper 
Minimum Wage ~ Position Paper
Rubric Code: Y245XB8
By srs011
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Position Paper Rubric
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Below Average

(N/A)

Unacceptable

(N/A)

Prewriting Requirement ~ 10 points

Excellent

Pro/Con list was well developed and fully completed (multiple pages and sources used). (10 pts.)
Good

Pro/Con list was partially completed. (8 pts.)
Fair

Pro/Con List-only one side was discussed in the list. (5 pts.)
Below Average

Pro/Con list-only one side was discussed but only had a few references. (2 pts.)
Unacceptable

No Pro/Con list turned in (0 pts.)
Thesis Statement ~ 20 points

Excellent

Thesis statement was clearly stated at the end of the introductory paragraph and was consistently maintained throughout the paper. Clear & important references to the topic were stated. Position was clear. (20 pts.)
Good

Thesis statement was clearly stated and was consistently maintained throughout the paper. Important references to the topic were stated, but clearer ones could have been mentioned. Position could be clearer. (16 pts.)
Fair

Basic thesis statement was attempted, but was not consistently maintained throughout the paper. A few important references to the topic were mentioned. Position is unclear. (11 pts.)
Below Average

Thesis statement was attempted, but was very weak and incomplete. One or no references to the topic were mentioned. Position is very unclear. (7 pts.)
Unacceptable

Thesis statement could not be determined. Position could not be determined. (0 pts.)
Supporting Evidence ~ 40 points

Excellent

Historical/Textual evidence and cited research clearly supported the assertion/thesis. Evidence and quotes were sufficient. Student connected topic to economic concepts and was able to identify these concepts discussed in class by bolding keywords (at least one per body paragraph) (40 pts.)
Good

Historical/Textual evidence and cited research clearly supported the assertion/thesis, but quotes and evidence were insufficient. Student connected topic to a few economic concepts and was able to identify these concepts discussed in class by bolding keywords (at least one for every two body paragraph) (32 pts.)
Fair

Thesis was supported by limited historical/textual evidence and research. Some evidence and quotes were improperly cited. Student connected topic to at least one economic concepts and was able to identify these concepts discussed in class by bolding keywords (at least one for every two body paragraph)
(24 pts.)
Below Average

The paper contained very few instances of historical/textual evidence and research. Most quotes were improperly cited and did not fully support the thesis statement. Student made no effort to connect topic to economic concepts discussed in class. (15 pts.)
Unacceptable

The paper contained no historical/textual evidence and research. There were no properly cited quotes that supported the thesis statement. Student made no effort to connect topic to economic concepts discussed in class. (0 pts.)
Organization ~ 15 points

Excellent

The paper had a focused presentation of the issue and an introduction that hooked the reader into the paper. It also had a clear beginning, middle, and end. Paragraphs had at least 5-7 sentences. Effective transitions were used. Outline for the paper was followed exactly (15 pts.)
Good

The paper had a somewhat focused presentation of the issue and an introduction that hooked the reader. The beginning, middle and end were somewhat clear. Most paragraphs had 5-7 sentences and transitions were used. The outline for the paper was followed most of the time. (12 pts.)
Fair

The paper had a vague presentation of the issue and an attempt to create an attention-grabbing introduction was made. Some paragraphs had between 5-7 sentences and some transitions were used. Some parts of the outline were followed (9 pts.)
Below Average

The paper did not clearly present the issue. The introduction was 'dry' and showed little originality. The paper was poorly organized. Paragraph length and transition use were inconsistent. Outline was not followed. (5 pts.)
Unacceptable

The paper did not clearly present a position and there was little to no organization throughout the paper. (0 pts.)
Diction/Wording ~ 5 points

Excellent

Formal diction in Standard English was used throughout the paper. No slang was used and the writer used the third person point of view throughout the paper. (5 pts.)
Good

Formal diction in standard English was used throughout most of the essay. Very few slang words were used and the writer used the third person viewpoint throughout most of the paper. (4 pts.)
Fair

Formal diction in Standard English was used in approximately half of the paper. Several slang words were used and the writer shifted viewpoints throughout half of the paper. (3 pts.)
Below Average

Little formal diction in Standard English was used and the writer shifted viewpoints (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) throughout most of the paper. (2 pts.)
Unacceptable

The paper was not written in Standard English. (0 pts.)
Format ~ 10 points

Excellent

The paper was a full 4 pages long. It was done in the proper MLA format with parenthetical citations and included an accurate works cited page. (10 pts.)
Good

The paper was a full 4 pages long, but there were some errors in MLA formatting/citations in the paper and the works cited page was partially inaccurate. (8 pts.)
Fair

The paper was shorter than 4 pages. It was done in the proper MLA format with parenthetical citations and included an accurate works cited page. (6 pts.)
Below Average

The paper was shorter than 3 pages and there were some errors in MLA formatting/citations in the paper and the works cited page was partially inaccurate. (3 pts.)
Unacceptable

The paper was shorter than 3 pages and it appears that no attempt was made to follow MLA formatting/citations within the paper and in the works cited page. (0 pts.)
Conventions ~ 10 points

Excellent

There were virtually no mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. (10 pts.)
Good

There were 5 or fewer mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar (8 pts.)
Fair

There were 7 or fewer mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar (6 pts.)
Below Average

There were 8 to 14 mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. (3 pts.)
Unacceptable

There were 15 or more errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. (0 pts.)
Paper Reflection Video - 10 points

Excellent

Student discussed all questions on the video reflection prompts and helped the instructor better understand their writing process and their understanding of this economic topic (10 pts)
Good

Student discussed all but one assigned question on the video reflection prompts and helped the instructor better understand their writing process and their understanding of this economic topic. (8 pts)
Fair

The students discussed a few of the questions asked in their reflection video, but not all. The instructor did not learn anything about their writing process but the student did show some understanding of the economic topic. (6 pts)
Below Average

The student only discussed one of the questions they were asked to in their reflection. The instructor did not learn anything about their writing process and did not show any understanding of the economic topic.
Unacceptable

The student did not complete the reflection video (0 pts)



Keywords:
  • Persuasive, writing, paper, technology,

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178