Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Economic Position Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Economic Position Paper
Minimum Wage ~ Position Paper
Rubric Code:
Y245XB8
By
srs011
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Position Paper Rubric
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Below Average
(N/A)
Unacceptable
(N/A)
Prewriting Requirement ~ 10 points
Excellent
Pro/Con list was well developed and fully completed (multiple pages and sources used). (10 pts.)
Good
Pro/Con list was partially completed. (8 pts.)
Fair
Pro/Con List-only one side was discussed in the list. (5 pts.)
Below Average
Pro/Con list-only one side was discussed but only had a few references. (2 pts.)
Unacceptable
No Pro/Con list turned in (0 pts.)
Thesis Statement ~ 20 points
Excellent
Thesis statement was clearly stated at the end of the introductory paragraph and was consistently maintained throughout the paper. Clear & important references to the topic were stated. Position was clear. (20 pts.)
Good
Thesis statement was clearly stated and was consistently maintained throughout the paper. Important references to the topic were stated, but clearer ones could have been mentioned. Position could be clearer. (16 pts.)
Fair
Basic thesis statement was attempted, but was not consistently maintained throughout the paper. A few important references to the topic were mentioned. Position is unclear. (11 pts.)
Below Average
Thesis statement was attempted, but was very weak and incomplete. One or no references to the topic were mentioned. Position is very unclear. (7 pts.)
Unacceptable
Thesis statement could not be determined. Position could not be determined. (0 pts.)
Supporting Evidence ~ 40 points
Excellent
Historical/Textual evidence and cited research clearly supported the assertion/thesis. Evidence and quotes were sufficient. Student connected topic to economic concepts and was able to identify these concepts discussed in class by bolding keywords (at least one per body paragraph) (40 pts.)
Good
Historical/Textual evidence and cited research clearly supported the assertion/thesis, but quotes and evidence were insufficient. Student connected topic to a few economic concepts and was able to identify these concepts discussed in class by bolding keywords (at least one for every two body paragraph) (32 pts.)
Fair
Thesis was supported by limited historical/textual evidence and research. Some evidence and quotes were improperly cited. Student connected topic to at least one economic concepts and was able to identify these concepts discussed in class by bolding keywords (at least one for every two body paragraph)
(24 pts.)
Below Average
The paper contained very few instances of historical/textual evidence and research. Most quotes were improperly cited and did not fully support the thesis statement. Student made no effort to connect topic to economic concepts discussed in class. (15 pts.)
Unacceptable
The paper contained no historical/textual evidence and research. There were no properly cited quotes that supported the thesis statement. Student made no effort to connect topic to economic concepts discussed in class. (0 pts.)
Organization ~ 15 points
Excellent
The paper had a focused presentation of the issue and an introduction that hooked the reader into the paper. It also had a clear beginning, middle, and end. Paragraphs had at least 5-7 sentences. Effective transitions were used. Outline for the paper was followed exactly (15 pts.)
Good
The paper had a somewhat focused presentation of the issue and an introduction that hooked the reader. The beginning, middle and end were somewhat clear. Most paragraphs had 5-7 sentences and transitions were used. The outline for the paper was followed most of the time. (12 pts.)
Fair
The paper had a vague presentation of the issue and an attempt to create an attention-grabbing introduction was made. Some paragraphs had between 5-7 sentences and some transitions were used. Some parts of the outline were followed (9 pts.)
Below Average
The paper did not clearly present the issue. The introduction was 'dry' and showed little originality. The paper was poorly organized. Paragraph length and transition use were inconsistent. Outline was not followed. (5 pts.)
Unacceptable
The paper did not clearly present a position and there was little to no organization throughout the paper. (0 pts.)
Diction/Wording ~ 5 points
Excellent
Formal diction in Standard English was used throughout the paper. No slang was used and the writer used the third person point of view throughout the paper. (5 pts.)
Good
Formal diction in standard English was used throughout most of the essay. Very few slang words were used and the writer used the third person viewpoint throughout most of the paper. (4 pts.)
Fair
Formal diction in Standard English was used in approximately half of the paper. Several slang words were used and the writer shifted viewpoints throughout half of the paper. (3 pts.)
Below Average
Little formal diction in Standard English was used and the writer shifted viewpoints (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) throughout most of the paper. (2 pts.)
Unacceptable
The paper was not written in Standard English. (0 pts.)
Format ~ 10 points
Excellent
The paper was a full 4 pages long. It was done in the proper MLA format with parenthetical citations and included an accurate works cited page. (10 pts.)
Good
The paper was a full 4 pages long, but there were some errors in MLA formatting/citations in the paper and the works cited page was partially inaccurate. (8 pts.)
Fair
The paper was shorter than 4 pages. It was done in the proper MLA format with parenthetical citations and included an accurate works cited page. (6 pts.)
Below Average
The paper was shorter than 3 pages and there were some errors in MLA formatting/citations in the paper and the works cited page was partially inaccurate. (3 pts.)
Unacceptable
The paper was shorter than 3 pages and it appears that no attempt was made to follow MLA formatting/citations within the paper and in the works cited page. (0 pts.)
Conventions ~ 10 points
Excellent
There were virtually no mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. (10 pts.)
Good
There were 5 or fewer mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar (8 pts.)
Fair
There were 7 or fewer mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar (6 pts.)
Below Average
There were 8 to 14 mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. (3 pts.)
Unacceptable
There were 15 or more errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. (0 pts.)
Paper Reflection Video - 10 points
Excellent
Student discussed all questions on the video reflection prompts and helped the instructor better understand their writing process and their understanding of this economic topic (10 pts)
Good
Student discussed all but one assigned question on the video reflection prompts and helped the instructor better understand their writing process and their understanding of this economic topic. (8 pts)
Fair
The students discussed a few of the questions asked in their reflection video, but not all. The instructor did not learn anything about their writing process but the student did show some understanding of the economic topic. (6 pts)
Below Average
The student only discussed one of the questions they were asked to in their reflection. The instructor did not learn anything about their writing process and did not show any understanding of the economic topic.
Unacceptable
The student did not complete the reflection video (0 pts)
Keywords:
Persuasive, writing, paper, technology,
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.