iRubric: Individual Videoconference Presentation rubric

Evidence of >4 occasions of disorganization and inaccuracy. Difficult to follow transitions and visuals throughout the presentation. Fails to orient audience throughout explanation of process for development of contributions to the tool. Poor attention to detail with >5 mechanical errors.

Evidence of 2-4 occasions of disorganization and inaccuracy. Ease of following transitions and visuals through half of the presentation. Orients audience to a minimum of 3 transition points throughout explanation of process for development of contributions to the tool. 3-5 mechanical errors with moderate attention to detail.

Information presented in a sequential, accurate and concise manner throughout. Transitions and visuals were easy to follow throughout. Orients audience at >3 transition points throughout explanation of process for development of contributions to the tool. Absent mechanical errors with superior attention to detail.

Student did not update log within expected timeframe. Any team member reports that student worked with disregard to group objectives/priorities across >2 occasions. Student reported to comment on peers' ideas without specific feedback.

Team member reported to have worked collaboratively for equal to or >50% of the length of the entire project. encourage individual member to share ideas amongst the group to perpetuate progress and improve quality of presentation/product. Individual log updated according to modified instructions.

Evidence of equitable contribution for the length of the entire project. Evidence that student provided specific feedback includes how peers' could strengthen ideas and be applied to a variety of content areas. Individual log updated according to original instructions.

Presentation is absent of overview of literature/systematic reviews for specific contribution. Absent evidence of integration of the research to the clinical case. Missing clinical question with hypothesis and supporting evidence. Missing proposed recommendations for further research for contributions to final product. Submits review of literature within 24 hours following presentation via bibliography.

Presents partial overview of literature/systematic reviews for specific contribution. Evidence of attempt for integration of the research to the clinical case. Develops a hypothetical clinical question with hypothesis and supporting evidence. Logical sequence of proposed recommendations for further research for contributions to final product. Submits review of literature within 1 hour following presentation via bibliography.

Presents a comprehensive overview of literature/systematic reviews for specific contribution. Demonstrates evidence of thorough integration of the research to the clinical case. Develops a hypothetical clinical question with hypothesis and supporting evidence. Critical analysis and logical sequence of proposed recommendations for further research for contributions to final product. Submits review of literature at the time of presentation via bibliography.