Skip to main content
iRubric: So You Think You Can Cook rubric

iRubric: So You Think You Can Cook rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
So You Think You Can Cook 
So You Think You Can Cook
Prepare an appetizer, entrée, and an dessert each must use one of the special ingredients. You will have 45 minutes to COOK! Clean your station as you go!
Rubric Code: XXC289W
By nhurley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Chefs for a day Cooking Contest
You will be graded on these 9 areas.
  Plongeur (dishwasher)

Hey...we all have our calling and perhaps you should be a preacher.

1 pts

Apprentice( learning)

You have potential, but don't quit your day job.

2 pts

Cuisinier (cook)

Your family will never be hungry thanks to your ability. You should come out to our food committee meetings.

3 pts

Sous Chef(deputy chef)

You may be able to start a side hustle if you keep this up. Food committee has been praying for someone like you!

4 pts

Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

You are by definition A CHEF! Are you sure that you shouldn't join the food committee?

5 pts

Creativity/ originality
1 pts

How creative was your end product with the special ingredient ?
Plongeur (dishwasher)

Plain, didn't try to explore their possibilities. Creativity is for PANSIES!
Apprentice( learning)

Spent little time. It was good but nothing special. Special ingredient was used.
Cuisinier (cook)

It is some what different. Put some thought and time into it. Special ingredient was used wisely.
Sous Chef(deputy chef)

It is special. Shows time and effort put in planning. Special ingredient was well used.
Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

It's unique. Shows lot of time and effort put in planning. Special ingredient was creatively used.
Taste
1 pts

How did the final product taste?
Plongeur (dishwasher)

Not something to be served at a meal due to its lack of flavor, but if this team did a great job at preparing our taste buds for the simple diets we may experience during the time of trouble.
Apprentice( learning)

Average- it was okay but could have been better. Flavor was mild.
Cuisinier (cook)

Good flavor- well cooked.
Sous Chef(deputy chef)

Good balance of flavor.
Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

Excellent flavor - very well cooked.
Presentation
1 pts

How well was food served?
Plongeur (dishwasher)

Put together quick and sloppy. If Picasso was a cook, your plates would be sold for millions!
Apprentice( learning)

Should have spent more time on this aspect.
Cuisinier (cook)

Plated well - decorated nicely.
Sous Chef(deputy chef)

Good presentation with colourful and appropriate deocration.
Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

Very well plated
Excellent decoration with a unique touch.
Special Ingredients
1 pts

How well utilized all the ingredients?
Plongeur (dishwasher)

Not all dishes used special ingredients or special ingredient use was not evident. At one point one of the crackers may have touched the dish, but it was quickly removed.
Apprentice( learning)

Used special ingredients, but it overpowered the dish.
Cuisinier (cook)

Used all the special ingredients.
Sous Chef(deputy chef)

Used all of the special ingredients in a way that made the dish better.
Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

Used all of the special ingredients in a way that made the dish stand out above the norm.
Cooperation between members
1 pts

How well all the members contributed?
Plongeur (dishwasher)

Little or no coordination between team members. This team seemed like they were actually competing against each other...which if that was the case, in a way, they won! Yeah?
Apprentice( learning)

Some coordination was visible between the team members.
Cuisinier (cook)

Good coordination between most of the team members.
Sous Chef(deputy chef)

Good team effort, all members were engaged.
Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

Very well coordinated team.
Hygiene and cleanliness
1 pts

How well was cleanliness maintained by the team.
Plongeur (dishwasher)

Poor hygiene and work station was messy the entire time. If this team was preparing us to be able to survive the bacteria of a third world country they did an AWESOME job.
Apprentice( learning)

Some poor hygiene or work station was messy most of the time.
Cuisinier (cook)

Hygiene was practiced at times, but work station could have used a little cleaning during cooking.
Sous Chef(deputy chef)

Hygiene was practiced at times and work station looked used but mostly tidy.
Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

Very hygienic , keeping in mind to wash, clean and wipe. One wouldn't even know that cooking was occurring in this kitchen because it was so clean!
Degree of Difficulty
1 pts

Could on of the kids from the Child Development Lab have made this recipe?
Plongeur (dishwasher)

Recipe was already together and very few steps were followed. Difficulty level was low. If this was a college simplicity survival food competition, this team would win!
Apprentice( learning)

Recipes involved a few steps and difficulty level was low.
Cuisinier (cook)

Recipes involved a few steps and difficulty level was normal
Sous Chef(deputy chef)

Recipes involved many steps, but difficulty level was normal.
Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

Recipes involved many steps and difficulty level was high.
"Freshmen" Involvement
1 pts

Was someone who was new to the ministry on the team?
Plongeur (dishwasher)

Forgot to get a freshman...but aren't we all freshman in our hearts?
Apprentice( learning)

Had a freshman that did something, but was not present for the entire process.
Cuisinier (cook)

May have had a freshman, but they were not really involved in the process
Sous Chef(deputy chef)

Had a freshman on the team who was actively involved in the process.
Chef de cuisine(Master chef)

Had multiple freshmen as a part of the team and included them in the process.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232