iRubric: Deutsch II Kapitel 2 Dialog rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Deutsch II Kapitel 2 Dialog Deutsch II Kapitel 2 Dialog For this skit, your interaction should take place at a shop (such as the butcher's, the baker's, or the produce store) or on Lastminute TV (A German home shopping network). The skit should include the following: three fruits, three vegetables, two chores, an invitation, a reason that the invitation was accepted or declined, sollen, a du-command, and 3 expressions of preference. This assignment is worth 100 points. Any additional points earned by scoring in the "outstanding" column will be awarded as bonus points. Rubric Code: XX8WC25 By fraupenn Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Kapitel I Dialog
	Outstanding 22 pts	Great 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Fair 10 pts	Poor 5 pts
Required Elements	Outstanding Students include ALL required elements and seamlessly include them into the plot of their skit.	Great Students include ALL required elements.	Good Students include 7 of the required elements.	Fair Students include 6 of the required elements	Poor Students include 5 or fewer of the required elements.
Grammar and Structure	Outstanding No errors; structure is appropriate to German usage.	Great 0-5 errors; structure is appropriate to German usage.	Good 5-10 errors; structure is appropriate with several errors.	Fair 10-15 errors; weak structure.	Poor 15-20 errors; little to no structure.
Presentation Time	Outstanding The skit is between 7 and 8 minutes long.	Great The skit is between 5 and 6 minutes long	Good The skit is between 3 and 4 minutes long.	Fair The skit is 2 to 3 minutes long.	Poor The skit lasts less than 2 minutes.
Group work time	Outstanding Group work time is used efficiently; conversation is exclusively devoted to work on the skit and ideas about it.	Great Group work time is used efficiently; conversation is mostly devoted to work on the skit and ideas about it.	Good Group work time is used somewhat efficiently; not all members are involved and conversation is only partially devoted to the skit.	Fair Group work time is not used efficiently; not all members are involved and conversation is mostly devoted to other topics.	Poor Group work time is not used efficiently; not all members are involved and conversation is not devoted to the skit.
Individual performance	Outstanding Student contributes enthusiastically to group; student speaks his/her part loudly and clearly	Great Student contributes willingly to group; student speaks loudly and clearly.	Good Student contributes to group; student speaks just loudly enough.	Fair Student contributes little to group; student does not speak loud enough for all to hear.	Poor Student does not contribute to group; student speaks too quietly to be heard.