Skip to main content
iRubric: COMM1102 15.09 Project #1 - Design Review rubric

iRubric: COMM1102 15.09 Project #1 - Design Review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
COMM1102 15.09 Project #1 - Design Review 
2015 COM1102 Project #1 - Design Review
Students choose a designer/artist and review their work. Review should compare 2 or more pieces, series, or themes (though not necessarily all from the same designer/artist). The review must include a visual analysis, interpretation, evaluation, and be based in part on research. Minimum 600 words, 1.5 spacing, 12 point font. Works cited page required, minimum 3 sources of 2 types.
Rubric Code: XX38C53
By jessekerpan
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Design Review
  Two Thumbs Up

5 pts

Thumbs Up

4 pts

So So

3 pts

Thumbs Down

2 pts

Structure & Flow

Two Thumbs Up

-Review has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, with 4 or more supporting points.
-Transitions are natural, smooth and logical with no repetition of elements.
-Review is of appropriate length (>600 words).
Thumbs Up

-Review has a clear intro, body, conclusion, with 3 supporting points.
-Transitions are smooth and logical with little repetition.
-Review is of appropriate length
So So

-Review's sections are present but may not be clear.
-Transitions are not always smooth, and/or there is much repetition.
-Review may be too short.
Thumbs Down

-Review is disorganized and/or missing sections.
-Transitions are not present, incorrectly used, and/or repeated.
-Review may be too short.
Analysis, Inference & Critique

Two Thumbs Up

-Student effectively describes several works and supports interpretations of the themes using extensive evidence from research.
-Inferences show sophisticated thinking about the concepts.
-Student applies knowledge about elements of design and uses the knowledge to support inferences with a high degree of relevance.
-Student compares works in great detail.
Thumbs Up

-Student supports interpretations about the design themes using satisfactory evidence from research.
-Inferences show deep thinking about the concepts.
-Student applies knowledge about elements of design and uses the knowledge to support inferences with considerable relevance.
-Student compares works in some detail.
So So

-Student supports interpretations about the design concepts using little evidence from research.
-Inferences show superficial understanding about the concepts.
-Student may not have applied knowledge about elements of design or used the knowledge to support inferences.
-Student may not have effectively compared works.
Thumbs Down

-Student does not use evidence from research to support interpretations about the design concept.
-Inferences show simple or little understanding about the concepts.
-Student did not apply knowledge elements of design and/or did not use the knowledge to support inferences.
-Student may not have compared works.
Grammar, Punctuation, & Spelling

Two Thumbs Up

-Rules of grammar usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
-Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure in a professional, formal tone.
Thumbs Up

-Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Language is clear and precise for the most part, but includes some conversational tone.
So So

-Paper contains some grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Language used jargon or conversational tone.
Thumbs Down

-Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Language used jargon or conversational tone.
Works Cited

Two Thumbs Up

-Sources have been cited in-text and on Works Cited page correctly, and in consistent format (MLA or Chicago).
Thumbs Up

-Sources have been cited in-text and on Works Cited page correctly with few errors. Consistent format was used with few errors.
So So

-Sources were not cited properly in-text and/or on Works Cited, and/or format was not consistent with either style (MLA or Chicago).
Thumbs Down

-Sources were not included in the paper, or were not organized to reflect the way in which they were used. Format was not consistent.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202