Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Biome Research Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Biome Research Paper
Research Paper
5th grade biome research paper
Rubric Code:
XX2C89
By
sglassell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Research Paper
Poor
4 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
IDEAS
Poor
The report does not have a clear focus. The paper shows little research and sources seem unreliable. Ideas seem to be pull out of the air.
Fair
The report may not be clearly focused on a single topic. Many additional details are needed to back up facts and examples. Some ideas seem unclear.
Good
The report is well researched. Some facts or examples needed a little more detail. Overall, ideas were good and came from reliable sources.
Excellent
The report is factual and well researched. It is focused on topic (main idea) and the subtopics that are required. It includes many interesting and well research facts.
ORGANIZATION
Poor
Ideas and facts are disorganized, unclear, or just listed. Topic sentences and conclusions are missing and many details are stray and unclear.
Fair
Facts and details are not well organized into paragraphs with clear main ideas. There are few topic sentences and some details are stray ideas. Indentions are not clear.
Good
Paragraphs are well organized. There are almost no stray ideas and topic sentences help to separate and organized. Indentions are done correctly.
Excellent
Main ideas are stated in topic sentences. Facts, examples, and details are organized in paragraphs creating a good flow. Conclusion paragraph ends on good note.
VOICE/WORD CHOICE
Poor
The writer copied many sentences from a source instead of using his or her own words. Word choice is repetitive and overused.
Fair
The writer did not use his or her own voice. Word choice is limited and repetitive.
Good
The writer mostly used his or her own words. There are good word choices with few repetitions.
Excellent
The writer uses his or her own words and chooses words to prevent repetition and create flow. Words are precise and descriptive.
SENTENCE FLUENCY
Poor
Sentences are short, unclear, repetitive, and very choppy.
Fair
The essay lacks sentence variety. It contained some short choppy sentences.
Good
The essay would benefit from greater sentence variety. The flow was choppy in areas.
Excellent
There are a variety of sentences. Similar ideas are combined to create complex and compound sentences. There was a smooth flow throughout.
GRAMMAR
Poor
Many mistakes make the paper hard to understand. Did not use checklist to revise or edit.
Fair
Mistakes sometimes make the essay hard to understand. Did not take enough time to revise or edit.
Good
There are a few mistakes, but they do not affect understanding. Checklist was used to edit and revise.
Excellent
There are almost no errors in grammar, capitalization, spelling or usage. Checklist was clearly used to edit and revise.
RESOURCES/CITING
Poor
There are 2 or less resources with many citing mistakes.
Fair
There are less than three sources with citing mistakes.
Good
There are three sources with a few citing mistakes.
Excellent
There are three or more resources that are cited correctly and neatly.
PRESENTATION
Poor
The final copy is messy. It may be illegible in many places. The title page is messy and thrown together or is missing title page.
Fair
The final copy is messy. It may be illegible in a few places. Title page is not neat.
Good
The final copy is legible and complete. It contains a picture that enhances the presentation, and there is a neat title page.
Excellent
The final copy is neat and legible. There is at least one good map or picture that enhances the presentation. There is a nice and neat title page.
WORK ETHIC
Poor
Did not use time wisely or did not keep up with each step of the research paper. Lost materials and procrastinated and did not cooperate with group.
Fair
Did not use time wisely. Sometimes, they did not listen to instructions and got behind with the assignment. Showed signs of procrastination.
Good
Kept up with research assignments, remained organized, and kepted up with materials. Assignment was turned in on time.
Excellent
Kept up with each step of the research project. They listened, worked hard, and used time wisely while helping others. Project was early or on time.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.