Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Field Experience Journals rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Field Experience Journals
Field Experience Journals
Maintain a reflective journal on the group Wellcoaching/Nutrition E-M-L sessions. There should be at least 12 entries (one per week/1 typed page per entry). What connections to the readings/group discussions did you observe? How did you assist? As you type the reflections, include the terminology presented on the group sessions, readings and/or instructor discussions. Make sure you provide your own thoughts, critique, and reflections on the experience.
Rubric Code:
XX245CC
By
muechi
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Health
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Journal Entries
Exceeds
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Journal 1
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good content. Needed more reflections on the experience and/or connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 2
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 3
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 4
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 5
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 6
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 7
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 8
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 9
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 10
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 11
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Journal 12
5 pts
Exceeds
Excellent reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Detailed account of experience.
Good
Good reflections on the experience and connections with texts and strategies. Not enough details provided.
Fair
Fair content. Not enough connection to class content, few details provided, and/or reflections needed more development.
Poor
Poor content, connections, and/or very little reflection.
Keywords:
Group Observation, Journal Entries
Subjects:
English
Health
Education
Types:
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.