- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Shakespeare Monologue and Sonnet rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Shakespeare Monologue and Sonnet Monologue The student will perform a monologue focusing on memorization, vocal delivery and basic emotional believability Rubric Code: XC4C97 By MrsSchmidt Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8

Shakes Monologue and Sonnet
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 17 pts	Fair 14 pts	Poor 11 pts	Score (N/A)
Memorization	Excellent Memorized 100% with minor "editorial" choices, verbiage stays intact	Good 5-10 mistakes	Fair More than 10 mistakes, needs more work, foundation is there	Poor Not memorized	Score
Voice	Excellent Excellent enunciation, words were clearly understood	Good Some slurring of words, lacks true articulation	Fair Projection and articulation are developing	Poor Difficult to hear and understand the actor's voice	Score
Emotional Believability/ Gestures	Excellent Clear emotional choices were made, gestures and movement supported story. Believable	Good Emotional choices obviously made; some choices were not parallel to script; gestures seemed borderline forced somewhat believable	Fair Little emotional attempt; lacks "feeling", actor appeared uncomfortable with gestures choices or actor OVER-acted and used gestures and movements inappropriate to situation	Poor Monotone delivery; no obvious emotional connection, no attempts to add gestures	Score
Focus/Concentration	Excellent Excellent focus; never broke character. Confident and poised.	Good Focus was strong; slight character break. Appeared confident	Fair Inconsistent focus; broke character more than once	Poor Lack of focus; broke character completely and could not recover	Score
Commitment	Excellent Actor seems committed to his character. Researching meaning, making supported choices. Showed great progress from beginning to end of project.	Good Actor seemed partially committed to the project, but lacked understanding of character and/or language, but tried all the way to the end to improve	Fair Actor attempted commitment to the character, not connecting to the language or the character's situation,	Poor Actor did not attempt a connection to his character, and was not committed to the project	Score