Skip to main content
iRubric: Bioengineering Ethics Debate rubric

iRubric: Bioengineering Ethics Debate rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Bioengineering Ethics Debate 
Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
Rubric Code: XC2AWW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Debate Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Scientific Evidence

Poor

Limited scientific evidence is presented, and/or evidence is often unsound.
Fair

Some evidence is presented and/or only some is scientifically sound.
Good

Sufficient scientifically sound evidence is presented, so as to support arguments made.
Excellent

A large amount of evidence is presented, which is scientifically sound.
Thinking

Poor

Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.
Fair

Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Good

Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate.
Excellent

Evidence presented clearly supports arguments made. Connections made and conclusions drawn are logical and reasonable.
Organization

Poor

Audience cannot understand argument because there is no sequence of information. Show limited evidence of preparation
Fair

Audience has difficulty following argument because student jumps around. Show some evidence of preparation.
Good

Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Show sufficient evidence of preparation.
Excellent

Student presents argument in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. Shows clear evidence of preparation.
Professionalism

Poor

Significant unprofessional language is used, sportsmanship and respect need improvement.
Fair

Some unprofessional language is used and/or respect and sportsmanship is sometimes evident.
Good

Student presents arguments with mostly professional language. Sportsmanship and respect are evident.
Excellent

Student presents their arguments in professional language, and demonstrates respect and good-sportsmanship.
Eye Contact

Poor

Student reads all of report with no eye contact.
Fair

Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report.
Good

Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes.
Excellent

Student maintains eye contact with audience or opponent, and seldom returning to notes.
Elocution

Poor

Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.
Fair

Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Good

Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
Excellent

Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.



Keywords:
  • Debate

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202