iRubric: ET ADV Speaking Rubric 41

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ET ADV Speaking Rubric 41 ET ADV Speaking Rubric Rubric to assess student's performance on their oral presentation. ET/YA 41,42,51,52 Rubric Code: XACBW7 By eliassessment Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Conversation about units' topics
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 1.5 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 2.5 pts
Vocabulary	Poor Student couldn't use most vocabulary words and expressions from the ones seen in class. He/she couldn't elaborate on his ideas because he lacked the vocabulary.	Fair Student used basic vocabulary and expressions from the ones seen in class in his/her answers.	Good Student used a good number of vocabulary words and expressions from the ones worked on in class.	Excellent Student showed an ability to use vocabulary words and expressions to express his/her ideas.
Accuracy	Poor Poor use of grammar. Meaning is often unclear. Many errors.	Fair Adequate use of grammar. Meaning is sometimes unclear. Some errors are still present.	Good Good use of grammar. Meaning is mostly clearly conveyed. A few errors are still present.	Excellent Excellent use of grammar. Meaning is very clear. Very few errors present. Ideas were expressed clearly.
Task Completion	Poor Student wasn't able to present his/her family tree. Relatives were barely mentioned and there was very little information about his/her relationship with them	Fair Student was somewhat able to present his/her family tree. Relatives were just mentioned and very few details of the relationship with each one were provided.	Good Student was able to present his/her family tree. Each member was properly introduced. Student gave a good description of his/her relationship with each member on the tree.	Excellent Student was able to introduce each member in his/her family tree and described his/her relationship with them in great detail, talked about the background and even shared anecdotes.
Speaking Mechanics	Poor Fluency was poor. The conversation was filled with long pauses. There was very little rhythm. This showed a lack of ability in using stress, intonation as well as other speech patterns. .	Fair Fluency was acceptable. There was little evidence of awareness or ability to manage intonation or stress patterns in English.	Good There was a good sense of fluency to this conversation. The student showed awareness and ability to manage intonation, pauses and stress patterns in English.	Excellent Fluency was native-live. Student showed an ability to follow the natural rhythm of the language. Making stresses, and pauses where expected.