Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Shark Attack Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Shark Attack Presentation
Clinical Rounds Presentation
Students will present information they have obtained about the arm and the methods used to reattach limbs. All presentations will include a question and answer portion which involves your fellow classmates.
Rubric Code:
X9XC2C
By
clondenberg
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Biology
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Shark Attack
Did not attempt
0 pts
Poor
4 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Overall Organization & Delivery
5 pts
Did not attempt
Did not attempt
Poor
Students presentation is unclear and unorganized. No teaching/learning form of media presented .
Fair
Students presentation is fairly organized. Information presented was clear.
One (1) teaching/learning form of media presented.
Good
Students presentation is clear and understandable, interesting, and extremely organized.
Two (2) teaching/learning forms of media.
Excellent
Students presentation is excellent, is extremely organized, interesting, creative, and easy to follow. Demonstrates originality. Uses more than two (2) teaching/learning forms of media.
Clarity
5 pts
Did not attempt
Did not attempt
Poor
The oral presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow. Poor delivery and timing of information. Did not seem to know the material. Poor discussion of questions.
Fair
The oral presentation was choppy, difficult to follow. Presenter did not have a grasp on the information. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too much reading. Needs more interaction and discussion of questions.
Good
The oral presentation was mostly smooth and seamless, few verbal pauses. The presenter appeared calm, had a general grasp of information.
Proficient delivery and timing of information. Proficient discussion initiated/ maintained
Excellent
The oral presentation was smooth and seamless. The presenter appeared calm and in command of the information. Exceptional delivery. Exceptional discussion intiated and maintained to facilitate learning
Knowledge Base
8 pts
Did not attempt
Did not attempt
Poor
The presenter failed to interrelates the patho, diagnostic techniques, treatment and nursing interventions. Presentation of material was unclear and not related to the topic at hand.
Fair
Presentation reflects some understanding of interrelation to the patho, diagnostic techniques, treatment and nursing interventions but no real understanding of its application to current nursing practice.
Good
Presentation demonstrates the application to current nursing practice in a clear and concise manner, including the patho, diagnostic techniques, treatment, and nursing intervention.
Excellent
Presentation demonstrates the application of the topic to current nursing practice in a clear and concise manner. Shows clear understanding of the relationship between evidence based nursing practice.
Participation
3 pts
Did not attempt
Did not attempt
Poor
Participates relevantly in less than 40% of all presentations
Fair
Participates relevantly in 40-69%of all presentations
Good
Participates relevantly in 70--89% of all presentations
Excellent
Participates relevantly in discussion of 90 - 100% of all presentations
Professional Speaking Atributes
3 pts
Did not attempt
Did not attempt
Poor
Student had no or minimal eye contact. Students' voice was inaudible, they mumbled, or were otherwise not understood.
• Heavy reliance on notes during presentation.
Fair
Students occasionally used eye contact. Students' voices were difficult to hear, used "ums" or other fillers
• Needs less reliance on notes.
Good
Student maintained eye contact most of the time. Showed enthusiasm most of the time. Voice was clear and understandable, minimal fillers used.
• Some reliance on notes.
Excellent
Student excellent eye contact, showed enthusiasm through entire presentation, and was easily understood. Spoke about subject with authority and ease.
Time
3 pts
Did not attempt
Did not attempt
Poor
Presentation lasts less 6 minutes or needs to be stopped by the instructor due to excessive time
Fair
Lasts less than 8 or more than 17minutes which includes discussion and question period
Good
Lasts less than 10 or more than 15 minutes which includes discussion and question period
Excellent
Lasts 10-15 minutes with time devoted to questions and discussion and lead discussion.
Peer Review
3 pts
Did not attempt
Did not attempt
Poor
Class rating is poor.
Fair
Class rating is fair.
Good
Class rating is good.
Excellent
Class rating is excellent.
Keywords:
evidence based, clinical, case study
Subjects:
Biology
Health
Medical
Nursing
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.