iRubric: Web Site Design with Nav rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Web Site Design with Nav Web Site Design with Nav Rubric Code: X96535 By jbdang Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

HTML/CSS Interest Site Project
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Coding Validation 25 %	Excellent There are no errors in the XHTML, CSS or other coding on the site as found by me or an online validator.	Good There are 1-3 coding errors on the site as found by me or an online validator.	Fair There are 4-5 coding errors on the site as found by me or an online validator.	Poor There are more than 6 coding errors on the site as found by me or an online validator.
Layout/Design 25 %	Excellent The web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.	Good The web site has an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements.	Fair The web site has a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements.	Poor The web site has a cluttered look and is confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements.
Navigation 20 %	Excellent Lilnks for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages and take reader where he expects to go. A user does not become lost.	Good Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from page to page and internal links take the reader where he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost.	Fair Links for navigation ake the reader where expected, but some needed links seem to be missing. A user sometimes gets lost.	Poor Some links do not take the reader to the sites/pages described. A user typically feels lost.
Graphics 15 %	Excellent Graphics are related to the theme or purpose of the site, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.	Good Graphics are related to the theme or purpose of the site, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.	Fair Graphics are of fair design, unoriginal, with elements that need enhancing such as red eye, etc.	Poor Graphics are poor design, unoriginal or borrowed work that need major enhancements such as red eye, improved cropping, etc.
Content 15 %	Excellent Content is appropriate for the project and complete with no major eliminations.	Good Content is appropriate for the project with moderate eliminations.	Fair Content is appropriate but incomplete in some areas.	Poor Content is inappropriate or of insufficient quantity as to make the web site inefficient.