- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Proposal Grading Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Proposal Grading Rubric Proposal Grading Rubric Draft a proposal for a renovation to the Fultz lunchroom. Rubric Code: X8C3XC By epenner388 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

My Program
	Excellent 10 (N/A)	Good 9-7 (N/A)	Fair 6-4 (N/A)	Poor 3-0 (N/A)
Proposal Format & cover page 10 pts	Excellent The proposal looks very professional, is neatly organized in a binder, duo-tang or folder. All elements are well separated and information is easy to find. Cover page is included and meets assignment criteria.	Good The proposal looks neat and is reasonably well organized but is lacking a professional look. May appear to have been put together in a rush.	Fair The proposal is reasonably neat but is lacking separation of elements or was handed in with loose papers or just stapled. May appear to have been put together in a rush.	Poor Proposal is obviously put together at the last minute or without care. The elements are disorganized and lacks any professional appearance.
Proposal Letter 10 pts	Excellent The proposal letter is written in a professional format. It contains an explanation of what you are submitting and highlights the strengths of the new design. The letter is written in a friendly manner and it is obvious the writer is trying to sell their design.	Good The proposal letter is missing 1 of the main components.	Fair The proposal letter is missing 2 of the main components.	Poor The proposal letter is missing 3 of the major components.
Proposal Introduction 10 pts	Excellent The proposal introduction explains why the lunch area at Fultz campus needs to be renovated. It provides a reasonable design concept, and explains the choices made in the design. It details the benefits of the design to the students and College.	Good The proposal introduction is missing 1 of the components.	Fair The proposal introduction is missing 2 of the components.	Poor The proposal introduction is missing 3 of the major components.
Overall Content of Proposal 10 pts	Excellent The student clearly supports his or her proposal. Proposal answers who, what, when, and where and how much it will cost.	Good The student somewhat clearly supports his or her proposal but does not answer all the who, what, when, and where and cost questions.	Fair The student somewhat unclearly supports his or her proposal but only answers 3 out of the 5 questions.	Poor The student unclearly supports his or her proposal.