Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: JC Attribute Group Eval rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
JC Attribute Group Eval
Evaluate your group members and your self on the amount of work you feel was put into your project. Your average will reflect your final grade.
Rubric Code:
X89C74
By
ryanroyle
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Philosophy
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Group Evaluation
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Great
4 pts
You
Poor
Did the bare minimum to get by. Did not contribute to group success. Did not work much with others.
Fair
Did enough to complete assignment. Didn't offer insight and didn't assist with completion.
Good
Did own work and contributed to the group. Met the requirements.
Great
Went above and beyond the necessary requirements. Contributed not just to own assignment, but to the group's success.
Member 1
Poor
Did the bare minimum to get by. Did not contribute to group success. Did not work much with others.
Fair
Did enough to complete assignment. Didn't offer insight and didn't assist with completion.
Good
Did own work and contributed to the group. Met the requirements.
Great
Went above and beyond the necessary requirements. Contributed not just to own assignment, but to the group's success.
Member 2
Poor
Did the bare minimum to get by. Did not contribute to group success. Did not work much with others.
Fair
Did enough to complete assignment. Didn't offer insight and didn't assist with completion.
Good
Did own work and contributed to the group. Met the requirements.
Great
Went above and beyond the necessary requirements. Contributed not just to own assignment, but to the group's success.
Member 3
Poor
Did the bare minimum to get by. Did not contribute to group success. Did not work much with others.
Fair
Did enough to complete assignment. Didn't offer insight and didn't assist with completion.
Good
Did own work and contributed to the group. Met the requirements.
Great
Went above and beyond the necessary requirements. Contributed not just to own assignment, but to the group's success.
Member 4 (6th Hour #1,2)
Poor
Did the bare minimum to get by. Did not contribute to group success. Did not work much with others.
Fair
Did enough to complete assignment. Didn't offer insight and didn't assist with completion.
Good
Did own work and contributed to the group. Met the requirements.
Great
Went above and beyond the necessary requirements. Contributed not just to own assignment, but to the group's success.
Subjects:
Philosophy
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Philosophy rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.