Skip to main content
iRubric: English 101 Essay rubric

iRubric: English 101 Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
English 101 Essay 
Analysis of Text (Visual or Written)
Rubric Code: X87692
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Expository Essay
  Exceeds

4 pts

Meets

3 pts

Fair/Adequate

2 pts

Does not meet

1 pts

MLA format and citations

Exceeds

The student uses MLA format correctly and cites all quoted or paraphrased passages and sources correctly. In addition, student includes a Works Cited page that is formatted correctly.
Meets

The student uses MLA format correctly most of the time; cites all quoted or paraphrased passages and sources correctly. Works Cited page is, for the most part, formatted correctly.
Fair/Adequate

Some parts of MLA format are correct and some are not; quoted or paraphrased passages are cited but not cited correctly. Works Cited page is included but is formatted incorrectly.
Does not meet

Student does not use correct MLA format and/or does not cite quoted or paraphrased passages; there may be evidence of plagiarism. No Works Cited page is included.
Introduction/Thesis

Exceeds

Intro engages the reader, introduces authors and leads effectively to the thesis; thesis is clearly stated and contains the author and the author's main mssage; thesis exhibits analytical thinking engagement with the topic, and complexity.
Meets

Intro engages the reader, introduces authors and leads to the thesis; thesis is generally stated and contains the author and the author's main mssage.
Fair/Adequate

Intro leads the reader to the thesis; thesis is present but lacks clarity; text and author may be named.
Does not meet

Intro fails to adequately tie into thesis; thesis is unclear and underdeveloped; text, author, and issues are not referenced.
Organization & Analysis

Exceeds

Paragraphs are engaging and each begin with transitional topic sentences that relate and support the thesis; each paragraph provides context before quotes, signal phrases and analysis/explanation of quotes. The analysis provides in-depth insights about the author's overall message and/or rhetorical devices/techniques used. The conclusion is strong and compelling.
Meets

Paragraphs are well-organized and usually begin with transitional topic sentences that relate and support the thesis; each paragraph provides context before quotes, but it is often too general; signal phrases are somewhat varied and analysis/explanation of quotes could be stronger. The analysis provides some insights about the author's overall message; may mention rhetorical devices. The conclusion good overall.
Fair/Adequate

Paragraphs are somewhat organized but often do not begin with transitional topic sentences that relate and support the thesis; each paragraph does not provide enough context before quotes and summary is short or too general; signal phrases are not varied and analysis/explanation of quotes often not provided. The analysis provides little insight about the author's overall message. The conclusion needs revision.
Does not meet

Essay presents a short and unclear intro, thesis is not clearly present. Paragraphs are not well developed; quotes are dropped without signal phrases and not explained; conclusion does not connect to thesis.
Grammar, Mechanics, and Spelling

Exceeds

There are few or no errors in mechanics, usage, word choice, grammar or spelling.
Meets

There are some errors in mechanics, usage, word choice, grammar or spelling; however, these errors do not cause coherence problems overall. Student needs to review grammar.
Fair/Adequate

There are several errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling and many word choice problems which cause confusion. Student needs intensive grammar review.
Does not meet

There too many errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling and many word choice problems which cause serious confusion. Student needs intensive review by attending the Writing Center, weekly tutoring, and grammar exercises online.
Writing Process

Exceeds

Student participated in all activities related to the writing process: peer review that includes active engagement with the work of peers, and proof of visit to the Writing Center or Pearson online tutoring. Student turns in final draft, rough draft, peer review sheet, Writing Center form or Pearson Tutor packet, in addition to additional drafts. Met the page requirement.
Meets

Student participated in all activities related to the writing process and gave peers some helpful commentary. Student turns in final copy, rough draft. Met page requirement.
Fair/Adequate

Student participated in some activities related to the writing process; put little effort in the peer review process; student turns in final copy, rough draft. Page requirement is met.
Does not meet

Student did not participate in any activities related to the writing process. Student turns in only the final copy; paper may be late. Page requirement may not have been met.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178