Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: CF PA Program PC 002.06 - EBM Literature review rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
CF PA Program PC 002.06 - EBM Literature review
CORE101/ CO102 Assessment 2: Literature review
Rubric Code:
X7WXWW
By
Bradol
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Medical
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
PC 002.06
High Distinction
(N/A)
Distinction
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Below standard
(N/A)
Introduction
High Distinction
The introduction is excellent, accurately defines key terms and clearly introduces the argument.
(10 Pts)
Distinction
The introduction is very good, accurately defines key terms and clearly introduces the argument.
(9 Pts)
Good
The introduction is good, accurately defines key terms and introduces the argument.
(8 Pts)
Poor
The introduction is satisfactory, with some attempt to define key terms and introduce the argument.
(7 Pts)
Below standard
The introduction is unsatisfactory. Key terms are not defined and the argument has not been introduced.
(6 Pts)
Understanding of literature
High Distinction
Effective understanding of reading is clearly demonstrated and includes excellent description of the literature.
(20 Pts)
Distinction
Effective understanding of reading is clearly demonstrated and includes a very good description of the literature.
(18 Pts)
Good
An understanding of reading is demonstrated and includes a good description of the literature.
(16 Pts)
Poor
Understanding of the reading is staisfactory and includes some description of the literature.
(14 Pts)
Below standard
Understanding of the reading is unstaisfactory. Inadeauate description of the literature.
(12 Pts)
Developing the argument
High Distinction
Excellent. Clear, coherent and logical argument developed in the main body.
(20 Pts)
Distinction
Very good. Clear, coherent and logical argument developed in the main body.
(18 Pts)
Good
Good attempt to present a clear, coherent and logical argument in the main body.
(16 Pts)
Poor
Satisfactory attempt to present a clear, coherent and logical argument in the main body.
(14 Pts)
Below standard
Unsatisfactory attempt to present a clear, coherent and logical argument in the main body.
(12 Pts)
Critical thinking
High Distinction
Excellent evaluation of reading material demonstrated which includes critical and authentic insights.
(20 Pts)
Distinction
A very good evaluation of reading material demonstrated which includes critical and authentic insights.
(18 Pts)
Good
A good evaluation of reading material demonstrated which includes some critical insight.
(16 Pts)
Poor
Satisfactory evaluation of reading material demonstrated which includes some critical insight.
(14 Pts)
Below standard
Unsatisfactory evaluation of reading material demonstrated. No attempt at critical thinking.
(12 Pts)
Conclusion
High Distinction
Excellent conclusion which summarises the arguments coherently and logically.
(10 Pts)
Distinction
A very good conclusion which summarises the arguments coherently and logically.
(9 Pts)
Good
A good conclusion which summarises the arguments coherently and logically.
(8 Pts)
Poor
Satisfactory conclusion which summarises the arguments.
(7 Pts)
Below standard
Unsatisfactory conclusion which does not summarise the arguments logically.
(6 Pts)
APA style and format
High Distinction
Excellent. Correct APA style conventions applied throughout including in-text citations, quotations, references and format.
(10 Pts)
Distinction
Very good. Correct APA style conventions applied throughout including in-text citations, quotations, references and format.
(9 Pts)
Good
Good. Correct APA style conventions applied throughout including in-text citations, quotations, references and format.
(8 Pts)
Poor
Satisfactory. Some correct APA style conventions applied including in-text citations, quotations, references and format.
(7 Pts)
Below standard
Unsatisfactory. APA style conventions are not applied.
(6 Pts)
Spelling and Grammar
High Distinction
Excellent Spelling and grammar.
No detectable errors when being read.
(10 Pts)
Distinction
Very Good Spelling and Grammar.
No detectable errors when being read.
(9 Pts)
Good
Good Spelling and Grammar.
No errors in Spelling and Grammar that make it hard to read.
(8 Pts)
Poor
Satisfactory Spelling and Grammar.
Few errors in grammar and spelling that make it hard to read
(7 Pts)
Below standard
Unsatisfactory use of spelling and grammar. Many errors that make the paper hard to read.
(6 Pts)
Subjects:
Medical
Psychology
Types:
Assignment
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Medical rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.