Skip to main content
iRubric: White Paper Discussion Board Rubric

iRubric: White Paper Discussion Board Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
White Paper Discussion Board Rubric 
White Paper Discussion Board Rubric
Online discussion board assignment
Rubric Code: X7C445
By mcmillan22
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Executive Summary
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Average

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Structure

Excellent

Your executive summary contains a very detailed Problem Section, History/Background Section, Effects of the Problem, Public Opinion (and a full-page bar or line graph), Recommendation, and Conclusion. The essay should be extensive and should clearly identify the problem and the solution.
Good

Your executive summary contains the proper sections and a line or bar graph and outlines the problem and the solution, but does not contain enough detail.
Average

Your executive summary either has sections which are too brief or contains paragraphs that have not been well-developed. There is a line or bar graph and a public opinion section. The executive summary is lacking in detail.
Fair

The executive summary lacks clarity and has incomplete sections (such as the problem section or the opinion poll). It contains very little detail and does not clearly explain what the problem and the solutions are.
Poor

Entire sections of the executive summary are missing or the polling report is missing and the executive summary lacks detail and not well explained.
Resources and Notes

Excellent

4 or more resources used. Author and title (or website) listed. Page numbers and authors should be listed. 4 or more informative websites identified.
Good

At least 3 resources used and documented, however the page number and author are not mentioned either within the sentence or in parenthesis. 3 more informative websites identified.
Average

2 resources used and documented on "Works Cited" page. Author and book title (or website) is listed. 2 informative websites identified.
Fair

One resource used and documented, however, either the page number or the title of the text is not mentioned. One informative websites identified.
Poor

Zero resources listed or quoted within the executive summary report. No websites identified
Organization

Excellent

Inviting introduction and conclusion that are a dramatic call for action so that the reader knows that the social issue is a serious one. The topics are related and grouped together in an organized way.
Good

Effective introduction and conclusion that is engaging to the reader. Facts follow a logical sequence.
Average

Simple introduction and conclusion Facts are linked in a logical manner.
Fair

Ineffective introduction and conclusion, OR, 1 is missing. Facts are strung together in an unorganized manner.
Poor

No introduction or conclusion is included. Hard to follow. Facts are copied from source.
Mechanics

Excellent

No spelling errors. Accurate punctuation and no grammar errors.
Good

Less than 2 spelling errors. No punctuation, grammar, or capitalization errors.
Average

3-5 spelling errors. 1-2 punctuation, grammar, or capitalization errors.
Fair

6 or more spelling errors. 3-5 errors on punctuation and capitalization. 3-5 grammar errors.
Poor

7 or more spelling errors. More than 6 punctuation, capitalization and grammar errors.
Discussion Management

Excellent

Multiple questions foster critical analysis of the issue from an occupation-base perspective. Guides discussion to stay appropriately focused.
Good

Limited number of questions that foster critical analysis of the issue from an occupation-based perspective. Guides discussion to stay appropriately focused.
Average

Limited number of questions that foster critical analysis of the issue from an occupation-based focus. Limited guidance to keep the discussion appropriately focused.
Fair

Questions do not demand critical analysis but do have an occupation-based focus. Does not guide the discussion to stay appropriately focused.
Poor

Questions do not demand critical analysis or encourage an occupation-based focus. Does not guide the discusioon to stay appropriately focused.



Keywords:
  • Executive Summary & Discussion



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232