Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: White Paper Discussion Board Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
White Paper Discussion Board Rubric
White Paper Discussion Board Rubric
Online discussion board assignment
Rubric Code:
X7C445
By
mcmillan22
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Health
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Executive Summary
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Average
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Structure
Excellent
Your executive summary contains a very detailed Problem Section, History/Background Section, Effects of the Problem, Public Opinion (and a full-page bar or line graph), Recommendation, and Conclusion. The essay should be extensive and should clearly identify the problem and the solution.
Good
Your executive summary contains the proper sections and a line or bar graph and outlines the problem and the solution, but does not contain enough detail.
Average
Your executive summary either has sections which are too brief or contains paragraphs that have not been well-developed. There is a line or bar graph and a public opinion section. The executive summary is lacking in detail.
Fair
The executive summary lacks clarity and has incomplete sections (such as the problem section or the opinion poll). It contains very little detail and does not clearly explain what the problem and the solutions are.
Poor
Entire sections of the executive summary are missing or the polling report is missing and the executive summary lacks detail and not well explained.
Resources and Notes
Excellent
4 or more resources used. Author and title (or website) listed. Page numbers and authors should be listed. 4 or more informative websites identified.
Good
At least 3 resources used and documented, however the page number and author are not mentioned either within the sentence or in parenthesis. 3 more informative websites identified.
Average
2 resources used and documented on "Works Cited" page. Author and book title (or website) is listed. 2 informative websites identified.
Fair
One resource used and documented, however, either the page number or the title of the text is not mentioned. One informative websites identified.
Poor
Zero resources listed or quoted within the executive summary report. No websites identified
Organization
Excellent
Inviting introduction and conclusion that are a dramatic call for action so that the reader knows that the social issue is a serious one. The topics are related and grouped together in an organized way.
Good
Effective introduction and conclusion that is engaging to the reader. Facts follow a logical sequence.
Average
Simple introduction and conclusion Facts are linked in a logical manner.
Fair
Ineffective introduction and conclusion, OR, 1 is missing. Facts are strung together in an unorganized manner.
Poor
No introduction or conclusion is included. Hard to follow. Facts are copied from source.
Mechanics
Excellent
No spelling errors. Accurate punctuation and no grammar errors.
Good
Less than 2 spelling errors. No punctuation, grammar, or capitalization errors.
Average
3-5 spelling errors. 1-2 punctuation, grammar, or capitalization errors.
Fair
6 or more spelling errors. 3-5 errors on punctuation and capitalization. 3-5 grammar errors.
Poor
7 or more spelling errors. More than 6 punctuation, capitalization and grammar errors.
Discussion Management
Excellent
Multiple questions foster critical analysis of the issue from an occupation-base perspective. Guides discussion to stay appropriately focused.
Good
Limited number of questions that foster critical analysis of the issue from an occupation-based perspective. Guides discussion to stay appropriately focused.
Average
Limited number of questions that foster critical analysis of the issue from an occupation-based focus. Limited guidance to keep the discussion appropriately focused.
Fair
Questions do not demand critical analysis but do have an occupation-based focus. Does not guide the discussion to stay appropriately focused.
Poor
Questions do not demand critical analysis or encourage an occupation-based focus. Does not guide the discusioon to stay appropriately focused.
Keywords:
Executive Summary & Discussion
Subjects:
English
Health
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.