Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Art History Peer Review rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Art History Peer Review
Peer review rubric
This meant to be an honest assessment of your group mates and yourself. Consider how they worked with you throughout the entire process and your contribution. In the comment space below, you may list any specific problems from your group members or areas in which your group particularly excelled.
Rubric Code:
X6X5CC
By
purvislr
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Needs Improvement
0.5 pts
Isolated
1 pts
Collaborative
2 pts
Personal Contribution
Presentation
20 %
Needs Improvement
Provided little to no assistance in preparing our presentation or was not available for group meetings. Disinterested in the project.
Isolated
Provided some assistance, but could have helped out more. Showed interest in completing the project
Collaborative
Provided a lot of assistance. Made sure project was complete
Involvement
20 %
Needs Improvement
Struggled to work with fellow group mates or had disagreements which interfered with the success of the project. Either did not share responsibilities or collaborate
Isolated
Worked well with fellow group mates. Did a good job sharing responsibilities. A few struggles, but resulted in a cohesive presentation.
Collaborative
Excelled working with the group. Excelled with sharing responsibilities and collaborating. Provided guidance and feedback.
Group Dynamics
Effort
20 %
Needs Improvement
Few members of the group were involved in developing the project
Isolated
Most members were involved in creating the presentation. One or two group members were less involved.
Collaborative
All group members were active in creating the presentation and developing content.
Meetings
20 %
Needs Improvement
Few group members attended planned meetings or some members were consistently absent.
Isolated
Most members attended group meetings. Occasional absences.
Collaborative
All members worked together to arrange and attend planned meetings.
Preparation
20 %
Needs Improvement
Few group members were prepared for meetings with research and images selected.
Isolated
Most group members completed research in a timely manner and were prepared for group meetings.
Collaborative
All members completed research in a timely manner and were prepared for group meetings.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
History
Types:
Assessment
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.