- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Art History Peer Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Art History Peer Review Peer review rubric This meant to be an honest assessment of your group mates and yourself. Consider how they worked with you throughout the entire process and your contribution. In the comment space below, you may list any specific problems from your group members or areas in which your group particularly excelled. Rubric Code: X6X5CC By purvislr Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: (Other) Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Needs Improvement 0.5 pts	Isolated 1 pts	Collaborative 2 pts
Personal Contribution
Presentation 20 %	Needs Improvement Provided little to no assistance in preparing our presentation or was not available for group meetings. Disinterested in the project.	Isolated Provided some assistance, but could have helped out more. Showed interest in completing the project	Collaborative Provided a lot of assistance. Made sure project was complete
Involvement 20 %	Needs Improvement Struggled to work with fellow group mates or had disagreements which interfered with the success of the project. Either did not share responsibilities or collaborate	Isolated Worked well with fellow group mates. Did a good job sharing responsibilities. A few struggles, but resulted in a cohesive presentation.	Collaborative Excelled working with the group. Excelled with sharing responsibilities and collaborating. Provided guidance and feedback.
Group Dynamics
Effort 20 %	Needs Improvement Few members of the group were involved in developing the project	Isolated Most members were involved in creating the presentation. One or two group members were less involved.	Collaborative All group members were active in creating the presentation and developing content.
Meetings 20 %	Needs Improvement Few group members attended planned meetings or some members were consistently absent.	Isolated Most members attended group meetings. Occasional absences.	Collaborative All members worked together to arrange and attend planned meetings.
Preparation 20 %	Needs Improvement Few group members were prepared for meetings with research and images selected.	Isolated Most group members completed research in a timely manner and were prepared for group meetings.	Collaborative All members completed research in a timely manner and were prepared for group meetings.