iRubric: Banned Book Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Banned Book Presentation Banned Book Presentation Our Rubric will be use to Formally Assess the students in their presentation of their Banned Book projects. Key Criteria for this project include: time limit, content, use of multimedia tools, and organization. The effective use of these tool will result in a superior grade Rubric Code: X63AWX By Whistler27 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Banned Book Presentation
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 3 pts
Time-Limit	Excellent Presentation is 7-10 minutes long.	Good Presentation is 5-7 minutes long.	Fair Presentation is 3-5 minutes long.	Poor Presentation is less than 3 minutes OR more than 10 minutes.
Content	Excellent Presentation illustrates a complete understanding of chosen banned book, as well as clearly states why the book was banned	Good Presentation lacks a sense of complete understanding of their banned book or the process by which a book is banned.	Fair Presentation understands general concepts associated with the banned book project, however lacks the attention to content details necessary for an effective presentation.	Poor Presentation shows poor effort on the part of the student, going so far as to suggest not having read the material.
Organization	Excellent Presentation is well organized, information is clearly stated and there is a natural flow between topics.	Good Organization of the presentation hindered the clarity of the material, though overall the intent was clear.	Fair A distinct lack of organization is apparent throughout the presentation, illustrating the lack practice and effort on the part of the student.	Poor Presentation shows little to no effort on the part of the student. Organization is not present, and is presented more as impromptu.
Use of Multimedia	Excellent The use of a multimedia tool is apparent and is used to enhance the learning of fellow students.	Good Though multimedia tools are present, the use of them was not effective, and lacked originality	Fair Multimedia tools, while present, lack the necessary components to engage classmates, and share information effectively	Poor Little to no use of multimedia tools.