iRubric: Grading Rubric for Publisher

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Grading Rubric for Publisher Grading Rubric for Publisher Rubric Code: X5WAW9 By aaprice14 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: (Other) Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Content	Poor The content presented does not have enough information for its intended audience.	Fair The content presented has some of the information necessary or is presented in a way that is confusing.	Good The content presented in complete and informative. It is presented in a standard way with some inefficiency.	Excellent The content presented in complete and informative. It is presented in ways that are interesting and an efficient use of space.
Graphics and Pictures	Poor Graphics do not go with the accompanying text or appear to be randomly chosen.	Fair Graphics go well with the text, but there are too few and the publication of the text seems to be heavy.	Good Graphics go well with the text, but there are so many that they distract from the text.	Excellent Graphics go well with the text and there is a good mix of text and graphics.
Spelling and Proofreading	Poor Several spelling errors in the publication.	Fair No more than 3 spelling errors remain after one person other than the typist reads and corrects the publication.	Good No more than 1 spelling error remains after one person other than the typist reads and corrects the publication.	Excellent No spelling errors remain after one person other than the typist reads and corrects the publication.
Enter Title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 7 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Attractiveness and Organization	Poor The publication’s formatting and organization of material are confusing to the reader.	Fair The publication has well-organized information.	Good The publication has attractive formatting and well-organized information.	Excellent The publication has exceptionally attractive formatting and well-organized information.
Uniqeness	Poor The student just used a template for the project	Fair The student took the template but adjusted it based on the promotion.	Good The student effectively changed the template to make it more appealing to the receiver.	Excellent The student went created an excellent document without the aid of publisher.
Teamwork	Poor Only one student did the work.	Fair The group did not functioned as a team.	Good The group functioned as a team.	Excellent The teamwork was excellent.