Skip to main content
iRubric: Selma Web Quest rubric

iRubric: Selma Web Quest rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Selma Web Quest 
Rubric Code: X5A733
By mmcvey
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Selma to Montgomery Web Quest
Points may be scored inbetween amount of available points per category.
  Poor

4 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

10 pts

Superior

Not all catergories listed will apply in this category.

15 pts

Defining Democracy

Poor

Student demonstrated no understanding of Wallace's and Johnson's meaning of democracy.
Fair

Student demonstrated some understadinding of Wallace's and Johnson's meaning of democracy, based on the documents.
Good

Student demonstrated full understanding of Wallace's and Johnson's meaning of democracy, based on documents.
Superior
Bibliography

Bibliography must be in MLA format.
Poor

Student did not meet minimum number of sources. Document is not in MLA format and contains several errors
Fair

Student met the minimum number of sources. Document is in MLA format with minor errors.
Good

Student exceeded minimum number of sources. Document is in correct MLA format with no errors.
Superior
Sources

Students are encouraged to find relevant and credible scholarly works to back up their research.
Poor

Student did not meet the minimum number of sources. Reliability and relevance of sources are highly questionable
Fair

Student located the minimum number of relevant sources. Reliability and relevance of some sources are questionable
Good

Student located relevant, scholarly sources that are of high quality. Student exceeded the minimum number required
Superior
Role Card

Enter description
Poor

Student did not complete the role card and left several questions unanswered and was not able to support the answers within the card
Fair

Student answerd most of the questions on the role card with correct information and supported the information within the role card.
Good

Student completed the role card and was able to sucessfully answer and support all information within the role card.
Superior
Time on Task

Poor

Students were constantly reminded about being on task and failed to complete the task on time
Fair

Student needed few reminders about remaining on task and finished the task on time.
Good

Student ramined on task throughout the web quest and completed the assignment on time.
Superior
Blog

students must take part in conversation and defend positions when necessary.
Poor

Student had minimal effort and participation in the blog and had little success in defending their position
Fair

Student participated in the blog, engaged in conversation and was able to partially defend their position.
Good

Student participated in the blog, engaged in conversation with others and sucessfully defended their position.
Superior
Essential Questions

students must show evidence of learining and pllication of knowledge to answer the essentail questions.
Poor

Student was able to answer and apply knowledge to 1-3 of the esssential questions.
Fair

Student was able to answer and apply knowledge to 4-5 of the essential questions.
Good

Student was able to answer and apply knowledge to 6-8 of the essential questions.
Superior

Student was able to answer and apply knowledge to 9-10 of the essential questions.
Written Assignment

Students should focus on thesis, supporting evidence and conclusions, as well as proper grammer.
Poor

No thesis, supporting evidence or conclusion.
Many gramatical errors and no evidence and integration of learning obtained from the web quest.
Fair

Thesis is poor, little support and evidence. Conclusion is weak and does not support the writing. Many gramatical errors and little evidence of knowledge obtained from the web quest.
Good

Tesis is present but needs improvement, needs more supporting evidence with a conclusion that partially addresses the writing. Some gramatical errors. Needs more evidence of knowledge obtained from the webquest.
Superior

Thesis is clear and well developed, supported with evidence, contains a conclusion, no gramatical errors and integrates knowledge obtained from the webquest.
Round Table Discussion

Poor

Student was unbale to answer questions and was unable to defend their position in the first person. Responses were derived from personal opinion, therefore altering responses.
Fair

Student answered few of the questions and was partly successfull in defending their position in the first person. Student allowed personal opinions to alter responses.
Good

Student answered and defended the majority of questions during the discussion. Student was mostly succesful in defending position in the first person and for the most part did not allow personal opinion to alter response.
Superior

Student successfully participated, answered and defended all questions during the discussion. Student was successful in defending position in the first person and did not allow personal opinion to alter responses.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232