Skip to main content
iRubric: Scenography Final Project- My Room rubric

iRubric: Scenography Final Project- My Room rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Scenography Final Project- My Room 
Scenography Final Project- My Room
Students are graded on accuracy, detail and completeness.
Rubric Code: X588WB
By lockharth
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Scenography Final Project- My Room
  Below Standards

6 pts

Approaches Standards

8 pts

Exceeds Standards

10 pts

Ground Plan

Below Standards

Non existent or completely lacking in detail and vision. No dimensions are present. Line weights are incorrect.
Approaches Standards

Shows a sense of designer's vision and detail, but could be more specific. Missing important dimensions/ detail. Line weights are in consistent or incorrect. There are some problems concerning movement from a director's point of view.
Exceeds Standards

Shows a clear vision of the design's footprint with complete dimensions and detail. It is clear that the designer has researched the space and has a clear understanding of space and movement.
Lighting Plan

Below Standards

Non existent or greatly lacking in sufficient detail. No paper work is included.
Approaches Standards

Plot is present, but does not convey all required information. Some paperwork is missing or inaccurate. Line weights/ colors are incorrect or confusing. Acting areas are illogical or not present.
Exceeds Standards

Plot and paperwork are clear and informative. All information is conveyed in the documents. Line weights/colors are correct. Shows a clear vision for the execution of the show's lighting, with logical acting areas.
Elevations

Below Standards

Non existent or greatly lacking in detail to the point that working drawings cannot be generated.
Approaches Standards

Shows some detail, but is not complete. Missing human figure for scale. Not fully dimensioned. Designer's research is somewhat evident in these plates. Line weights are incorrect.
Exceeds Standards

Fully detailed with a true sense of the "feel" of the show. Dimensions are clear and with correct line weights.
Working Drawings

Below Standards

Non existent or greatly lacking in detail and dimensions. It is unclear as to how the scenery is to be constructed.
Approaches Standards

Some, but not all dimensions are shown. Human figure may not be shown, but scale is noted by another means. Special construction methods are noted throughout the plates. Line weights are incorrect.
Exceeds Standards

Items are fully dimensioned and detailed. Where needed, sections views are included. Plates leave not doubt whatsoever concerning the construction of the elements shown.
Section Views

Below Standards

Non existent or lacking in detail. No human figure is present. Dimensions are lacking throughout.
Approaches Standards

Section views are present where required. Some dimensions are missing. Some missing detail, such as trim notes are missing, but the overall idea of the scenic element is clear. No masking present. Line weights are incorrect.
Exceeds Standards

Section views are fully dimensioned and detailed. The designers shows sufficient views to leave no room for questions concerning the element's construction. Information regarding masking and electrics is present and accurate.
Rendering

Below Standards

Non existent, or lacking in detail, color, or depth. Does not communicate the designer's intent. May also be too sketch-like for a final presentation or incomplete. Figure not present
Approaches Standards

Rendering is somewhat detailed, but is lacking some visual elements which are integral to the overall design. While the technique is progressing, the information conveyed is still lacking a sense of completeness.
Exceeds Standards

Rendering is a fleshed out vision of the overall scenic and lighting design. The element of design are clearly incorporated and detail, including the human figure, is clear. Gives a true sense of the mood.
Painter's Elevations

Below Standards

Non existent, or lacking in detail to the point of confusion.
Approaches Standards

Elevations are included, but they are incomplete, mis-labeled, or lack a clear design choice. Dimensions, where needed, are not present. No scale is noted on plates.
Exceeds Standards

Elevations are clear, neat and well notated. There is a clear visual communication of the designer's intent. It is evident that the designer has invested time and research into the project.
Title Blocks

Below Standards

Either is missing or there is no consistency from one plate to the next.
Approaches Standards

Title Blocks are present, but do not contain all information needed to guide the reader/TD.
Line weights are incorrect.
Exceeds Standards

Title Blocks are clear and informative, giving the viewer all information needed to properly build/navigate the design.
Spider Grid Rendering

Below Standards

Non existent or incomplete.
Approaches Standards

Somewhat complete, but lacking important details and a sense of a specific design idea.
Exceeds Standards

A clear and communicative tool for sharing the design idea to the director and technicians. Clearly titled and detailed.
Overall Design

Below Standards

No effort was made to establish a clear concept. Work is, at best, incomplete and does not convey an overall plan or vision.
Approaches Standards

The conceptual ideas are present, though may not be fully realized in this phase of the work. Designer should do further research and provide clearer detail for a complete package to be present.
Exceeds Standards

Ideas are clear and the design serves the project very well. The design is specific and based on clear and abundant research. Designer has considered all elements and gives the director ample room to stage in an interesting manner.



Keywords:
  • Theatre Design


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232