Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Scenography Final Project- My Room rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Scenography Final Project- My Room
Scenography Final Project- My Room
Students are graded on accuracy, detail and completeness.
Rubric Code:
X588WB
By
lockharth
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Scenography Final Project- My Room
Below Standards
6 pts
Approaches Standards
8 pts
Exceeds Standards
10 pts
Ground Plan
Below Standards
Non existent or completely lacking in detail and vision. No dimensions are present. Line weights are incorrect.
Approaches Standards
Shows a sense of designer's vision and detail, but could be more specific. Missing important dimensions/ detail. Line weights are in consistent or incorrect. There are some problems concerning movement from a director's point of view.
Exceeds Standards
Shows a clear vision of the design's footprint with complete dimensions and detail. It is clear that the designer has researched the space and has a clear understanding of space and movement.
Lighting Plan
Below Standards
Non existent or greatly lacking in sufficient detail. No paper work is included.
Approaches Standards
Plot is present, but does not convey all required information. Some paperwork is missing or inaccurate. Line weights/ colors are incorrect or confusing. Acting areas are illogical or not present.
Exceeds Standards
Plot and paperwork are clear and informative. All information is conveyed in the documents. Line weights/colors are correct. Shows a clear vision for the execution of the show's lighting, with logical acting areas.
Elevations
Below Standards
Non existent or greatly lacking in detail to the point that working drawings cannot be generated.
Approaches Standards
Shows some detail, but is not complete. Missing human figure for scale. Not fully dimensioned. Designer's research is somewhat evident in these plates. Line weights are incorrect.
Exceeds Standards
Fully detailed with a true sense of the "feel" of the show. Dimensions are clear and with correct line weights.
Working Drawings
Below Standards
Non existent or greatly lacking in detail and dimensions. It is unclear as to how the scenery is to be constructed.
Approaches Standards
Some, but not all dimensions are shown. Human figure may not be shown, but scale is noted by another means. Special construction methods are noted throughout the plates. Line weights are incorrect.
Exceeds Standards
Items are fully dimensioned and detailed. Where needed, sections views are included. Plates leave not doubt whatsoever concerning the construction of the elements shown.
Section Views
Below Standards
Non existent or lacking in detail. No human figure is present. Dimensions are lacking throughout.
Approaches Standards
Section views are present where required. Some dimensions are missing. Some missing detail, such as trim notes are missing, but the overall idea of the scenic element is clear. No masking present. Line weights are incorrect.
Exceeds Standards
Section views are fully dimensioned and detailed. The designers shows sufficient views to leave no room for questions concerning the element's construction. Information regarding masking and electrics is present and accurate.
Rendering
Below Standards
Non existent, or lacking in detail, color, or depth. Does not communicate the designer's intent. May also be too sketch-like for a final presentation or incomplete. Figure not present
Approaches Standards
Rendering is somewhat detailed, but is lacking some visual elements which are integral to the overall design. While the technique is progressing, the information conveyed is still lacking a sense of completeness.
Exceeds Standards
Rendering is a fleshed out vision of the overall scenic and lighting design. The element of design are clearly incorporated and detail, including the human figure, is clear. Gives a true sense of the mood.
Painter's Elevations
Below Standards
Non existent, or lacking in detail to the point of confusion.
Approaches Standards
Elevations are included, but they are incomplete, mis-labeled, or lack a clear design choice. Dimensions, where needed, are not present. No scale is noted on plates.
Exceeds Standards
Elevations are clear, neat and well notated. There is a clear visual communication of the designer's intent. It is evident that the designer has invested time and research into the project.
Title Blocks
Below Standards
Either is missing or there is no consistency from one plate to the next.
Approaches Standards
Title Blocks are present, but do not contain all information needed to guide the reader/TD.
Line weights are incorrect.
Exceeds Standards
Title Blocks are clear and informative, giving the viewer all information needed to properly build/navigate the design.
Spider Grid Rendering
Below Standards
Non existent or incomplete.
Approaches Standards
Somewhat complete, but lacking important details and a sense of a specific design idea.
Exceeds Standards
A clear and communicative tool for sharing the design idea to the director and technicians. Clearly titled and detailed.
Overall Design
Below Standards
No effort was made to establish a clear concept. Work is, at best, incomplete and does not convey an overall plan or vision.
Approaches Standards
The conceptual ideas are present, though may not be fully realized in this phase of the work. Designer should do further research and provide clearer detail for a complete package to be present.
Exceeds Standards
Ideas are clear and the design serves the project very well. The design is specific and based on clear and abundant research. Designer has considered all elements and gives the director ample room to stage in an interesting manner.
Keywords:
Theatre Design
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.